Congress and President Obama are under pressure to reschedule marijuana. While rescheduling makes sense, it doesn't solve the state/federal conflict over marijuana (descheduling would be better). But more important, it wouldn't fix the broken scheduling system. Ideally, marijuana reform should be part of a broader bill rewriting the Controlled Substances Act.

The Controlled Substances Act created a five-category scheduling system for most legal and illegal drugs (although alcohol and tobacco were notably omitted). Depending on what category a drug is in, the drug is either subject to varying degrees of regulation and control (Schedules II through V) - or prohibited, otherwise unregulated and left to criminals to manufacture and distribute (Schedule I). The scheduling of various drugs was decided largely by Congress and absent a scientific process - with some strange results.

[continues 601 words]

In six months, California will join Maine, Nevada and probably a few other states in deciding whether to legalize large-scale commercial production of marijuana. Residents will be inundated with wild claims about the promises and pitfalls of these initiatives.

You will hear debates about government revenue, criminal justice benefits, the environment and the effect of legalization on Mexican drug-trafficking cartels. Public health conversations may prove especially contentious. Some will claim that legalization will constitute a net gain for health. Others will say the exact opposite.

[continues 621 words]

Since 1970, when President Richard Nixon signed the Controlled Substances Act, marijuana has been a Schedule I drug. Congress placed it in the most restrictive category of psychoactive substances, those with no currently accepted medical value and a high potential for abuse or dependence. The upshot was a renewed ban on marijuana, except for highly restricted research purposes.

I say renewed because Congress first prohibited marijuana use for non-industrial purposes in 1937. The Schedule I designation ratified the status quo, with one notable exception: The 1970 CSA in fact reduced federal penalties for cannabis possession, a bit of Nixon-era liberality few recall.

[continues 689 words]

There are rumors that the federal government may soon lift its ban on marijuana, but that wouldn't end marijuana prohibitions in the United States. This incongruity is the result of federalism: the ability of each jurisdiction - the federal government and every state - to maintain its own laws as to which drugs are illegal and which are not.

Completely legalizing marijuana in the United States would require the actions of both the federal government and every state government. If the federal government repealed its criminal prohibition of marijuana or rescheduled the drug under federal law, that would not change state laws that forbid its possession or sale. Likewise, state governments can repeal their marijuana laws, in whole or in part, but that does not change federal law.

[continues 618 words]

H.R. 4378 Addresses the Need to Provide Treatment Facilities for Those Already Bound by Addiction.

Education and Prevention Are Imperative in Fighting the Epidemic, but Don't Work by Themselves. the Economic Advantage of Treating Addicts Is Huge, When Factoring in Health Care and Judicial Costs.

Since Nancy Reagan first spoke the familiar words "Just say no" in 1982, this country has been engaged in a war on drugs that to some seems unwinnable. There is currently a piece of legislation in Congress that takes a different approach to the matter. Rather than solely focusing on prevention of substance abuse, the Access to Substance Abuse Treatment Act of 2016 (H.R. 4378) addresses the overwhelming need to provide treatment facilities for those already bound by the chains of addiction to heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) and phencyclidine (PCP).

[continues 466 words]

A bill that would have allowed Tennesseans to weigh in on whether to decriminalize possession of low-level amounts of marijuana has failed in the Legislature. The Senate Judiciary Committee killed the proposal April 12.

The measure, which was sponsored by Memphis Democrats Antonio Parkinson and Sara Kyle, would not have legalized marijuana possession. Instead, it would have allowed voters to make their opinion known on whether police should arrest people in possession of one ounce of marijuana or less or give them a warning instead.

The proposal would have allowed Metro governments or municipalities with their own police departments to put the question on whether to arrest or warn to voters during a normal election. The results of the election would be advisory only.

[end]

If "reason and honesty" were part of the public discourse regarding cannabis (marijuana) prohibition (Letter: "Marijuana misinformation," by Bob Alley, April 3, 2016), it would never have been orchestrated from the beginning.

Historically, its existence is due to racism, greed and the omission of science.

It's truly mistaken to claim, "Medical science has access to drugs that provide more relief with less damage than does pot," since cannabis often competes with opiates, which are responsible for an epidemic of addiction and death rates in America. Scientifically, cannabis is safer than aspirin and less addictive than coffee.

[continues 64 words]

Re: "Culture of healing needed to battle painkiller addiction," by David Plazas, April 8.

In response to your article, I would like to express how strongly I agree that our culture relies entirely too much on painkillers.

Recently my stepfather had a neck surgery, and as expected, he was in a considerable amount of pain after the procedure. After being prescribed 60 Percocet pills, he took a total of five. When asked why, this was what he said: "I was more scared of being addicted to the painkillers than I was of the pain."

[continues 136 words]

Having read your articles on overdose and abuse of opioids, I had to wonder your aim in these reports and to notice that your advertisers were rehab and insurance companies.

To everyone who has lost a loved one to overdose, my sympathy, but to state that opioids are not an effective means of pain management for chronic pain is inconceivable. For the help that I experience through them, it is an oasis in an otherwise consistent sea of hurt.

Having lived through the 1980s and 1990s of toughing it out and taking an aspirin, suddenly pain was a concern I dealt with.

[continues 112 words]

A former corrections officer was sentenced to one year plus one day in prison and an inmate was sentenced to 30 months in prison for a scheme to smuggle marijuana into the Federal Correctional Institution in Memphis, the office of U.S. Attorney Edward L. Stanton III said Monday.

The corrections officer, Keair Kemp, 33, of Horn Lake, and inmate Travonte Johnson, 34, of Millington, planned last year to smuggle the drug into the prison, according to a news release.

"In exchange for cash, Kemp agreed to unlawfully carry marijuana into the prison and deliver it to Johnson, thus violating his official duties as a correctional officer," Stanton's spokesman, Louis Goggans, said in the release.

Kemp pleaded guilty in December 2015 to one count of accepting a bribe, and Johnson pleaded guilty in January to one count of offering a bribe to a public official, Goggans said.

[end]

Re: "Cannabis prohibition does more harm than good," by Cecily Friday Shamim, and "Patients deserve access to medical marijuana," by Allison Barker Watson, Sunday Insight, March 27.

Please be more objective and honest in your selection of guest editorial writers than your March 27 "Point/Counterpoint," which contained two letters from pot lobbyists who used emotion rather than science to encourage our society toward addiction and brain damage.

Google: "Harvard Pot Study" to learn of the long-term damage in casual pot users to "...the nucleus accumbens and the amygdala - key regions for emotion and motivation, and associated with addiction."

[continues 51 words]

Former first lady Nancy Reagan hadn't been dead for hours Sunday when the knives came out.

Her "Just Say No" to drugs campaign, one left-wing organization said, had a "disastrous legacy." Another one opined that the slogan "helped America lose the war on drugs."

"The problem was," an article on ThinkProgress.org said, "'just saying no' to drugs didn't actually work." Really? It's a simplistic statement, to be sure, but, in fact, actually just saying no to drugs works every time it is tried. Each time someone refuses an offer of drugs makes it easier to just turn down an offer the next time out. Eventually, refusing drugs - always the right thing to do - becomes ingrained.

[continues 397 words]

I'm sure Dr. Greg Elam means well (Re: "Live Drug-Free," Jan. 14), however, cannabis (marijuana) isn't a "drug" but rather a God-given plant as described on literally the very first page of the Bible.

The plant cannabis should not be compared with drugs that kill "50 people a day" since it has not killed one single person in over 5,000 years of documented medical use. That's safety on a Biblical scale.

A sane or moral argument to cage sick citizens for using cannabis doesn't exist.

Stan White, Dillon, Col. 80435

[end]

Re: "Tennessee must get with the times on medical marijuana," by David Hairston, Dec. 13.

Regarding Mr. Hairston's article about legalizing medical marijuana, I found the logic faulty for the following reasons:

The statement that "God designed our bodies to use cannabinoids to maintain health " because cannabinoid receptors have been identified is like saying "God intends us to have cancer or diabetes because we have the genes for those."

Our bodies adapt to the environment and use the food and chemicals we put in them trying to best achieve a balance of chemicals in the brain. However, when we are out of balance in one area, the brain will seek to remedy it in another, thus the reason for using mood-altering drugs.

[continues 158 words]

States that permit qualified patients to access medical marijuana via dispensaries possess 24.8 percent lower rates of opioid addiction and overdose deaths than states where medical marijuana is illegal, according to a study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, a nonpartisan think tank.

In Tennessee in 2014, deaths from opioid overdose exceeded deaths by car accident and also exceeded deaths by gunshot.

Opioid overdose deaths in Tennessee have also increased by around 10 percent per year since 2012. It is by all accounts an epidemic. In the meantime, no deaths have been reported from marijuana overdose, and the reason is that marijuana does not shut down a person's breathing.

[continues 55 words]

Are we sure, Tennessee? Are we absolutely sure that marijuana legalization isn't in our best interest?

While not a native of this state, I am rapidly learning that highway maintenance isn't a priority here.

Now, I don't know about you, but if a citizen wants to blaze in his own home, it should be his right. Let that consumer go to his local dispensary, make his purchase and contribute (above the outrageous nearly 10 percent sales taxes) to the general fund.

[continues 159 words]

Says Exception Aims to Benefit PTSD Sufferers

NASHVILLE - While most Tennessee Republican leaders have indicated opposition to any steps toward legalization of marijuana, state Rep. Jeremy Faison said he hopes they will make an exception for military veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.

Faison, R-Cosby, is drafting legislation that would "decriminalize" possession of marijuana by veterans diagnosed with PTSD, motivated by conversations with several veterans who believe the medicinal properties of marijuana would help them far more than prescription medications.

[continues 368 words]

"Right to Try" legislation has been passed that allows terminal Tennessee patients to access experimental drugs and treatments, provided these medicines or procedures have made it through the first phase of Food and Drug Administration trials.

House Bill 143 will grant Tennessee doctors the ability to prescribe to terminally ill patients drugs that haven't yet been fully vetted by the FDA, as long as they've passed phase 1 testing for safety.

Pay attention to that last statement, as it should become quite clear that this legislation bypasses the FDA regulatory process.

[continues 146 words]

Here we go.

No more beef or pork. Goodbye, cows and hogs.

Guns are the reason for all the violence. Goodbye, guns.

Pollution from cars is killing all of us. Goodbye, vehicles.

Wait, I have found some good news. I can go to several states and legally get marijuana.

Also, I can buy all the whiskey and beer I like.

No worries with either of those causing problems for anyone.

Life is getting crazy.

Calvin Ruff, Joelton 37080

[end]

Re: "Tenn. Should Embrace Legalized Weed," by Cecily Friday, Shamim, Nov. 30.

Ms. Shamim's positions on this issue are expected. As a physician, I am fully aware of the benefits and harms of marijuana.

Ms. Shamim cites the benefits only but also makes changes to suit. If we consider the first few of her points, it will become clear that the rest do not merit consideration.

Ms. Shamim cites a "placebo controlled" study of marijuana in PTSD patients in ScienceDaily that showed positive results. A "placebo control" for marijuana is not possible.

[continues 201 words]