HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html
Pubdate: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 Source: Bottom Line (Frostburg State University, MD, Edu) Column: Always Fair, Never Balanced Contact: http://www.thebottomlineonline.org/home/lettertotheeditor/ Copyright: 2009 The Bottom Line Website: http://www.thebottomlineonline.org/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/5088 Author: Fabion Seaton LEGALIZE IT Why is marijuana illegal? I have been asking myself this for years, and I still cannot find an answer. They say, "It's bad for you," but cigarettes are still legal, so that cannot be the reason. They say, "it would just make driving more dangerous," but we allow people to drive while drunk as long as they are below the legal limit. I do not buy any of the justifications that people give me for marijuana prohibition. There are more benefits to marijuana legalization than there are detriments. First, marijuana provides the government with another taxable revenue stream. Both federal and state governments could impose taxes on marijuana in order to generate income in this down economy. According to the CDC, 6.0% of Americans over 12 years has used marijuana in the last year. Although that number pales in comparison to the 25 percent of American males who smoke cigarettes, it is still sizable enough to provide revenue for a government that is currently strapped for cash. Second, regulation is safer for America's children than prohibition. When the government regulates marijuana usage, they have control over several things. 1. They have control over age limits for usage. If marijuana was treated in the same fashion that we treat alcohol, less children would use it, because it would be harder to acquire. 2. They have control over the potency of the marijuana. Marijuana is getting more potent yearly; The Washington Post said that locally grown marijuana is sometimes two or three times more potent that imported cartel-supplied marijuana. 3. There would no longer be a black market for marijuana, so the associate crimes would decrease. Since there would no longer be a profit in illicit marijuana distribution, the dastardly evil-doers who flock to weed farms would no longer have an incentive to continue their criminal enterprises. Third, it would curb prison overpopulation. The fact that there are American citizens in prison for non-violent possession offenses is disgusting. When was the last time you met a violent pothead? Potheads are mellow, sometimes lazy, and always relaxed. It is also illogical. Take this anecdote as an example: Joe is an average Joe Pothead. Joe was arrested one day for possession. Due to the draconian drug laws, Joe was sent to prison with hardened criminals. Keep in mind that Joe had never committed a violent crime before in his life. His crimes were victimless. Looking at Joe's story, how could anyone expect him to leave prison better than he started? Joe will leave prison a worse person than he began. Our government is taking nonviolent criminals and placing them in close proximity with people who have an almost encyclopedic knowledge of crime. We are creating our own problems. Although that logic was a stretch, it is not without merit. It makes no sense to place nonviolent criminals in prison. Who benefits? They do not benefit from it, nor do the taxpayers, nor does society. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake