HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html Doctor Found Reckless For Not Relieving Pain
Pubdate: Thu, 14 Jun 2001
Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA)
Section: Pg A-1
Copyright: 2001 San Francisco Chronicle
Contact:  http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/388
Author: Matthew Yi, Chronicle Staff Writer
Note: Chronicle staff writer Ray Delgado contributed to this report

DOCTOR FOUND RECKLESS FOR NOT RELIEVING PAIN

$1.5 Million Jury Verdict For Family Of Cancer Patient Who Went Home To 
Hayward To Die

In a trial that became a forum for the debate over how pain is treated in 
American medicine, an Alameda County jury yesterday found that an internist 
committed elder abuse and reckless negligence by not giving enough pain 
medication to a Hayward man dying of cancer.

The jury awarded the man's family $1.5 million in general damages. But 
jurors did not find that Dr. Wing Chin, a doctor at Eden Medical Center in 
Castro Valley, had acted with malice or had intentionally caused emotional 
distress, so there was no award of punitive damages.

The case is a major victory for patients' rights advocates who argue that 
many doctors don't treat pain adequately, said Barbara Coombs Lee, 
president of Compassion in Dying, a Portland advocacy group that provided 
legal assistance for the lawsuit.

It's a good day for us, she said yesterday. This case was against all odds. 
. . . This is a precedent-setting case because, to our knowledge, never 
before has under-treating pain been defined as elder abuse.

Beverly Bergman, 45, the daughter of retired railroad detective William 
Bergman, who died in 1998, said she was happy with the outcome.

We're very grateful that the jury worked so hard, she said. It'll send a 
message to the medical community that they cannot under-medicate without 
consequences.

After the verdict, Chin simply shook his head when a reporter asked for a 
response, and then was whisked away by his attorney, Bob Slattery.

Slattery later said he was disappointed by the jury's decision. We're 
reconsidering our options on the appeal, he said.

Eden Medical Center spokeswoman Cassandra Phelps also called the verdict 
disappointing.

Dr. Chin has devoted his entire career to caring for patients, many of whom 
are seniors, Phelps said. It is difficult for those who know and work with 
him to accept the verdict.

In order for the Bergman family to win the case, they had to prove not only 
negligence by Chin, which is usually enough in a malpractice suit, but 
reckless negligence.

On their fourth day of deliberations, six men and six women decided 9-3 
that there were elder abuse and recklessness, while deadlocking 8-4 on the 
questions of malice and emotional distress. In a civil case, at least nine 
jurors must agree to reach a decision.

The verdict will have lasting effects on pain treatment, doctors say.

It worries me because the message is, you're damned if you do and you're 
damned if you don't, said Dr. Scott Fishman, who heads the University of 
California at Davis Medical Center's division of pain medicine.

For years, most doctors have erred on the side of under-medicating for fear 
of legal ramifications from potential addiction to pain killers, he said.

This case is going to say to (doctors), that it's going to be a risk not 
treating pain, Fishman said.

Dr. Steven Pantilat, who teaches at the University of California at San 
Francisco's medical school, said although doctors will now face pressure 
from both sides, there's plenty of room in the middle to relieve pain for 
patients safely.

It can be done. It can be challenging in some cases, but it's a practice 
that should be well in the scope of a physician's practice, he said.

William Bergman, who suffered from lung cancer, was admitted to Eden 
Medical Center in early 1998.

The lawsuit alleged that Chin was reckless in not prescribing strong enough 
medication for Bergman, who complained of severe back pain.

Bergman stayed at the hospital for six days as nurses charted his pain on a 
1-to-10 scale, 10 being the worst. A report rated his pain consistently in 
the 7-to-10 range and on the day he was discharged, because he wanted to go 
home to die, his pain was at level 10.

He died at home Feb. 24.

Bergman's family filed a complaint with the California Medical Board, which 
took no action against Chin because it did not find clear and convincing 
evidence of a violation of the Medical Practice Act, board spokeswoman 
Candis Cohen said earlier.

Although the board's medical consultant concluded that the hospital's pain 
management was inadequate, Cohen said not every error a physician makes 
rises to the level where the board could take disciplinary action.

Cohen refused to comment yesterday on the verdict.

The jurors, who had been deliberating since Friday, said the debate was 
intense, with arguments often escalating into shouting matches.

It was a very tough case for all of us, said jury foreman Carlos Clavel, 
33, of San Lorenzo. Some of us didn't feel Dr. Chin was negligent. . . . 
Some of us felt he used treatment based on his best judgment.

Another juror said that after hearing the evidence, it was obvious that the 
charges were legitimate.

I felt the evidence was clear and convincing, said Sherrie Graston, 36, of 
Fremont. Part of treating a patient is to treat pain.

The verdict fuels the fire for state Assemblywoman Dion Aroner, D-Berkeley, 
who authored a bill that would require all California doctors to take a 
pain management course.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth