HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html
War On Drug Tourism
Pubdate: Wed, 22 Dec 2010
Source: Metro Times (Detroit, MI)
Copyright: 2010 Metro Times, Inc
Contact: http://www.metrotimes.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1381
Author: John Sinclair
HIGHER GROUND WAR ON DRUG TOURISM
As America Relaxes Some Laws On Pot, Europe Gets Paranoid
Lately I've been fascinated by the remarkable disparity between the
progress America seems to be making toward legalizing marijuana and --
dare we say it? -- all recreational drugs utilized by U.S. citizens to
get high on, and on the other hand the regressive direction taken by
Canada and the European Union to reverse the positive effects of
well-established social policies centered on tolerance and "harm
reduction" for recreational drug users
The wildly successful medical marijuana movement in America has
severely altered the public perception of pot smoking in a positive
way and helped pave the path to the eventuality of full legalization --
because, after all, why should we all have to be sick in order to get
high without risking arrest?
While things look better for legalization in America than at any time
in at least 50 years, a terrible turn to the idiotic right is being
taken by the government of the Netherlands -- the center of sane and
sensible drug policy since the 1970s -- and by the European Union itself.
In a disgusting new development, the EU's top court ruled Dec. 10 that
Dutch authorities can bar foreigners from cannabis cafes as a legally
acceptable measure to combat "drug tourism."
A 2005 law enacted in Maastricht, a town positioned near the Belgian
and German borders, prohibits local coffee shops from admitting
non-Dutch patrons. In September 2006, the city's mayor shut down the
Easy Going coffee shop after it admitted two EU citizens who were not
residents of the Netherlands.
The proprietor, Marc Josemans, appealed the mayor's ruling on the
grounds that the law mandates unequal treatment of EU citizens. But
the European Court of Justice, based in Luxembourg, ruled that coffee
shop owners are not protected by the EU's freedom of movement and
nondiscrimination principles when they are in the business of
marketing cannabis.
"That restriction is justified by the objective of combating drug
tourism and the accompanying public nuisance," the court said, adding
that drug tourism "is a concern for the public order and health of
citizens" in all EU states.
The court noted that Maastricht's 14 coffee shops attract around
10,000 visitors every day -- that's 3.9 million visits a year -- and 70
percent of them are not from the Netherlands, according to data
provided by the city of Maastricht.
What a terrible nuisance! That's an awful lot of local business to be
chasing away for the sake of what -- a higher place in heaven at the
final judgment? A seat at the right hand of God? Seventy black-eyed
virgins? After all, there's no intelligent rationale available to the
opponents of marijuana use, particularly in terms of the "health of
citizens." This is a medicine!
Even in the coffee shop setting, there's a lot to be said for the
medicinal qualities of smoking some good herb, enjoying the fellowship
of like-minded citizens and imbibing some good music over the sound
system. The uplifting effect on one's mental health alone is a benefit
you can't say too much about.
What powers the drive to prohibit and punish recreational marijuana
use? The mountains of public gibberish and the draconian laws drawn up
and enforced by the drug-war establishment against the benign
marijuana smoker attest to nothing less than some kind of religious
war against people who don't worship the right gods in the correct
way.
Let's say it right out: My nearly 50 years as a daily smoker of
marijuana have led me to conclude that there's no public harm from
marijuana use. No deaths result from marijuana use. There's no ill
effect on one's health except for the possibility of weight gain from
indulging the munchies. There's never been anything at all wrong with
marijuana, and there never will be. It's a good thing, a gift from the
gods one might say, and to persecute persons who are inclined to have
a few puffs in the privacy of their own lives is simply the height of
cruelty and outright meanness.
But the jackboots are marching even closer to home: Cannabis Culture
reports that the Canadian Senate has passed Bill S-10, which includes
mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana offenses. The bill has to be
approved by the House of Commons for a vote before it can be enacted
into law.
If passed, Jeremiah Vandermeer writes, "S-10 will bring mandatory
minimum jail sentences for marijuana offences to Canada for the first
time, including six months for growing as few as five marijuana plants
and 18 months for extracting hash or making pot edibles and sharing
them."
A conviction for growing or dealing near a school or park increases
the mandatory sentence to two years, and other "aggravating factors"
can add more time. According to Vandermeer, the bill even includes
life sentences for nonviolent marijuana crimes.
Liberal Sen. Tommy Banks pointed out on the Senate floor that "yes,
there are circumstances that none of us would think of as trafficking
in a controlled substance which are caught by this bill.
"Giving your friend a Tylenol because he or she has a headache is an
offense under this bill. Growing six marijuana plants in order to have
a party with your friends at graduation is an offense under this bill.
No money made, just doing it for friends.
"We have to look at what the law says, and it says, among other
things, that if I give Sen. Baker a Tylenol 3 because he has a
headache and if we happened to be near a school, whatever that means --
'near' is not defined -- that is trafficking and I can be
prosecuted."
A rare bright spot on the contemporary international horizon is the
rational but politically brave stance just taken by former British
drugs minister Bob Ainsworth, who proposed to the House of Commons
that all drugs, including heroin and cocaine, should be legalized to
beat dealers and "make the world a safer, healthier place, especially
for our children."
Before Ainsworth's speech, Nigel Morris reported in The Independent,
the former Home Office minister responsible for drugs policy and
former Defense Secretary who "witnessed first-hand the huge opium
fields in Afghanistan that supply the West ... will argue that it is
better for addicts to receive their fixes on prescription rather than
relying for their supply on the international criminal gangs."
And, Morris adds, Ainsworth "will receive the backing of senior MPs of
all parties who will argue that the current tough stance on drugs is
counter-productive. ... As Labour Party MP Paul Flynn said: 'This
could be a turning point in the failing UK war on drugs.'"
Ainsworth told The Independent that his departure from government has
given him the freedom to express his view that the "war on drugs has
been nothing short of a disaster. ... Prohibition has failed to
protect us. Leaving the drugs market in the hands of criminals causes
huge and unnecessary harm to individuals, communities and entire countries.
"It is time to replace our failed war on drugs with a strict system of
legal regulation. ... We must take the trade away from organized
criminals and hand it to the control of doctors and pharmacists" --
and, we hasten to add, into the capable hands of our heroic
community-based marijuana farmers, all over the world.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D