Pubdate: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 Source: Toronto Star (CN ON) Copyright: 1999, The Toronto Star Contact: http://www.thestar.com/ Author: Tim Harper, Toronto Star Ottawa Bureau TOBACCO GIANT SUED FOR $1 BILLION Ottawa's move accuses company of smuggling cigarettes OTTAWA - The federal government has launched a $1 billion (U.S.) lawsuit against one of the country's tobacco giants, alleging it smuggled cigarettes into Canada. The lawsuit, believed to be one of the largest ever launched by Ottawa, alleges RJR-Macdonald Inc. and its related holding companies, defrauded Ottawa by smuggling the smokes into Canada, ultimately forcing the federal government to roll back taxes on cigarettes. The cigarette manufacturer, which controlled about 20 per cent of the market in the mid-1990s through its flagship brand Export `A,' was involved in an ``elaborate scheme to defraud, corrupt, cheat, steal and conceal'' when it snuck its product back into Canada, all the while blaming the smuggling problem on organized crime, court documents say. In so doing, Ottawa alleges it lost tax revenues, was forced to spend money combating smuggling, and had to give up its most potent weapon against youth smoking - prohibitive pricing - according to the complaint filed in U.S. Federal Court in Syracuse, N.Y. The complaint for damages filed by the federal government contains allegations that have not been proven in court. ``The defendant's goal of making money conflicted with Canada's goal of protecting young people from smoking,'' Justice Minister Anne McLellan said. ``So they set out to undermine Canada's policy.'' Health Minister Allan Rock said the rate of smoking among youths aged 15 to 19 had jumped from 21 per cent in 1991 to 31 per cent five years later, after taxes were chopped to combat smuggling. ``This rise is due, in large part, to the roll-back on cigarette taxes which was forced on us by the rise in the smuggling in the 1990s,'' Rock said. ``This massive increase in smuggling did not just happen.'' Tobacco companies, Rock said, will ``not be allowed to frustrate public policy in Canada.'' The government lawsuit alleges RJR and its related companies ``used an elaborate network of smugglers and off-shore shell companies to ensure an abundant supply of cheap cigarettes to the Canadian market. ``In so doing, they undermined our policy of cutting tobacco usage.'' The lawsuit seeks: * To restrain the defendants and their alleged co-conspirators from engaging further in smuggling and other unlawful conduct. * To compel the defendants to surrender the profits of their unlawful conduct. * To recover substantial damages suffered by Canada. Guy Cote, a spokesperson for the company now known as JTI Macdonald-Corp., a subsidiary of Tokyo-based Japan Tobacco, called the allegations ``a new twist on an old story.'' But Cote said the company would withhold further comment until its lawyers had thoroughly studied the court documents filed by Ottawa. ``We welcome a court appearance to allow us to tell our side of the story,'' he said. Cote could not say whether the tobacco company would seek an out-of-court settlement. McLellan, however, ruled that out as an option. ``We have no intention of settling,'' she said. The federal ministers said the $1 billion figure is conservative. It involves the smuggling of more than 2 billion cigarettes. The civil action was filed in the United States because of the amount of evidence already heard there in U.S. legal action, officials said. There have already been 21 guilty pleas entered in New York state. One man identified as a smuggling ringleader was sentenced to 17 years in prison Monday. McLellan said criminal charges would be up to the RCMP. ``It's very significant when the justice minister accuses the tobacco industry of being involved in criminal conspiracy,'' said Rob Cunningham of the Canadian Cancer Society. Even though Ottawa filed a civil action, he said, it could eventually lead to criminal charges. A civil action demonstrates political will, he said. ``I hope this will lead to the recognition that tobacco taxes can be raised substantially and quickly without contraband resulting,'' he said. ``I don't think this is the end of it.'' Ottawa moved under the U.S. statute known as the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Under its terms, a judge can triple damages, says Fred Bartlit, the Chicago-based lawyer who will be representing the government. Ontario is taking advantage of the statute in its $59 billion lawsuit against U.S. tobacco companies to recover the health-related costs of smoking. But the province's lawsuit is stalled in the courts because a separate U.S. court case involving the government of Guatemala is challenging that legal avenue. The Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers Council, the organization which speaks for the country's cigarette manufacturers, is also named in the federal government's lawsuit. The CTMC, according to Revenue Minister Martin Cauchon, was used by RJR-Macdonald to ``throw the government off the smuggling trail.'' Specifically, according to the government complaint, the CTMC, headed by well-known Ottawa lobbyist Rob Parker, contended that cross-border smuggling was controlled by diverse groups such as the Italian Mafia, Asian and Russian organized crime and motorcycle gangs. While it was making these charges, RJR was setting up a shell company in the U.S., the government complaint states. Yesterday, a spokesperson for the CTMC said it would not immediately respond. Reform health critic Keith Martin (Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca) said Ottawa should back their civil action with a move to raise cigarette prices in central Canada back to the same levels as those in neighbouring American states. NDP health critic Judy Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North Centre) said the suit was a ``half measure. ``Why didn't the government take action to recoup health care costs. ``Any measure like this should go hand-in-hand with a substantial tax increase as quickly as possible.'' - --- MAP posted-by: Don Beck