Pubdate: Thu, 17 Dec 1998
Source: Reuters
Copyright: 1998 Reuters Limited.
Author: Mahmoud Kassem

MARIJUANA ADVOCATES CONTINUE PUSH FOR LEGAL USE

WASHINGTON, Dec 15 (Reuters) - One by one, they came to the podium --
lawyers, doctors and business executives -- to confess publicly their years
of marijuana use.

``I've smoked marijuana for 30 years, and inhaled too,'' Paul Kuhne, a
Tennessee businessman, told a recent conference called by the National
Organisation for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) to explain the difficulty
of smoking marijuana and being a social conservative at the same time.

Kuhne came to the conference to defend medicinal marijuana. His wife, who
died recently, also used marijuana, he said.

``My business partner told me I had to stop smoking marijuana if I wanted to
keep my job,'' he said. So he stopped. He drank martinis instead and wrote
letters to newspapers calling for the legalisation of marijuana, prompting
police to raid his home after a surveillance operation.

There they found posters and leaflets calling for the legalisation of
marijuana. And again his partner warned him. ``My business partner told me I
had to take down those posters if I wanted to keep my job,'' he said.

Kuhne, with other successful middle-aged professionals, came to Washington
to press for legalisation of marijuana and for the day when adults would not
be penalised for using it. According to the FBI's most recent Uniform Crime
Report, state and local officials arrested about 700,000 people on marijuana
charges in 1997. Activists want to cut this figure to zero.

MANY HAVE SMOKED, FEW ADMIT IT

NORML could not have timed its annual conference better. In the Nov. 3
elections more than 55% of voters approved measures legalising the use of
marijuana for medical purposes in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon and
Washington state.

More than a quarter of all Americans have smoked marijuana at some point in
their lives, according to polls conducted for NORML, but few have come to
the capital to make a declaration, and fewer still in high office are
prepared to put an end to what activists say is hypocrisy.

``Look where marijuana got Bill Clinton. Politicians confess their youthful
indiscretions, then call for tougher drug laws,'' sniped Ethan Nadelmann, a
professional activist against anti-drug measures. Clinton, in his first run
for president in 1992, said he had tried marijuana but had not inhaled.

Other participants in the conference justified marijuana legalisation by
citing well-known figures such as Britain's Queen Victoria who allegedly
ingested cannabis regularly. Some even showed their defiance by openly
smoking the drug.

Irvin Rosenfeld, a stockbroker and one of a handful of legal users in the
country who obtain their marijuana from the U.S. government for medical
purposes, sat at the back of the conference hall puffing on one of his
rationed joints.

``Law enforcement can't touch me,'' he explained with some relish as he
flaunted a bag of marijuana cigarettes that he receives freeze-dried from
the government.

Every year the Office of National Drug Policy reminds the conference that
smoking marijuana is illegal. Only a handful of marijuana smokers are
exempt, certified by an experimental 1978 programme that the government is
phasing out.

GOVERNMENT INSISTS MARIJUANA BAD FOR HEALTH

The government says it has not shifted from a long-standing line: ``Smoked
marijuana damages the brain, heart, lungs and immune system.'' It spent
$17.1 billion this year to combat drugs, and the Education Department alone
is spending $739 million to warn children off drug use.

Barry McCaffrey, head of the White House anti-drug office, said after the
election that marijuana reformers ignore scientific principles in their
drive to legalise the drug.

``The propositions (to legalise medicinal marijuana) are thinly veiled
attempts to legalise marijuana for general use,'' McCaffrey said.
``Marijuana advocates have mounted a well-financed, sophisticated public
relations campaign to persuade Americans to their point of view. They use
personal anecdotes rather than science to support their position.''

Despite last month's approval of medical marijuana in five states, the
federal government has maintained its opposition to the drug by denouncing
the methods of medical marijuana activists and in one case by blocking
election procedures.

In Washington, D.C., exit polls by NORML showed that 69 percent of voters
backed legalisation, but a provision inserted in the budget by
Representative Bob Barr, a Georgia Republican, bars the district from using
any funds to count the vote, so the referendum has no legal effect.

``These initiatives in Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, the District of Columbia,
Nevada, Oregon and Washington state are deceptive and dangerous,'' McCaffrey
said. ``Allowing a purported medication to circumvent federal approval does
a great disservice to the American public.''

'TIME FOR GOVERNMENT TO GET OUT OF OUR LIVES'

Marijuana activists reject federal interference in state initiatives, saying
it only shows how out of touch with public opinion the government is. ``It's
time for the government to get out of our personal lives and let us as
individuals decide ... how we conduct ourselves in the bedroom and whether
we smoke marijuana or drink alcohol when we relax,'' NORML director Keith
Stroupem said.

Activists do not agree on the best way to legalise marijuana, but all agree
that the recent success of medical marijuana initiatives marks a watershed
for their movement. Some believe medical marijuana should be the first goal
and the acceptance of marijuana at a grass-roots level will lead ultimately
to wider progress for personal freedoms.

``A modicum of discretion and a low-key approach is the key to success for
medical marijuana,'' said Robert Raich, a lawyer for the Cannabis
Co-operative in Oakland, California, where the city council declared a
medical state of emergency when federal authorities ordered the co-operative
to close on Oct. 20.

It has since reopened but Raich fears too much publicity galvanises federal
agents to file closure orders. ``Vociferous and aggressive calls to legalise
marijuana are not always good for the immediate cause of legalising medical
marijuana,'' he said.

- ---
Checked-by: Rolf Ernst