Pubdate: Saturday, 27 Dec 1997 Source: Times Union (Albany, NY) Section: Editorial Contact: http://www.timesunion.com/ REPEAL ROCKY'S DRUG LAWS Gov. Pataki Didn't Go Far Enough In Commuting Sentences Of Three Convicts As is the case each holiday season, New York's governor commutes the sentences of prisoners whose conduct behind bars has proved them worthy of early release. This year, Gov. Pataki used the occasion to grant clemency to three prisoners who had been serving long terms under New York state's tough Rockefeller drug laws. By so doing, Mr. Pataki followed in the footsteps of Governors Cuomo and Carey before him. But he should lead instead of follow. There was a time, early in his administration, when Mr. Pataki seemed poised to do just that and push for reform of these draconian laws laws that have, over time, added needlessly to prison overcrowding and run up huge costs to taxpayers. Rightly and compassionately, Mr. Pataki criticized the statutes as a relic of another era, when hard time seemed the best way to stop a rising incidence of drug crime. Yet since those days, drug crime hasn't diminished. If anything, time has proved that tough punishment isn't the beall answer it was supposed to have been. Yet Mr. Pataki isn't even hinting at reform these days. Even as he announced the clemencies, he was careful to avoid raising speculation that he might appeal to the Legislature for change. "While I remain firmly committed to continuing our successful effort to fight crime, these individuals worked hard to earn a second chance,'' the governor said in releasing the names of the prisoners chosen for early parole. Those prisoners like so many others sentenced under the Rockefeller drug law mandates were not the bigmoney pushers the statutes were supposed to get off the streets. Instead, they were typical of the hundreds of minor offenders who were sentenced under laws that leave judges no choice in tailoring punishment to fit the crime. For example, Angela Thompson, one of the three prisoners named by Gov. Pataki, was convicted in 1989 at age 17 for selling two ounces of cocaine at the behest of her uncle, a known drug dealer. The judge didn't want to impose such a harsh sentence, but she had no choice. The two other prisoners receiving clemency also were firsttime offenders. All were serving a mandatory 15 years to life. Time has proved the Rockefeller laws as ineffective largely because bigtime dealers have the money and resources to escape arrest and prosecution. If they are captured and tried, they have the cash to pay for the best legal defense team available. It's the lowerlevel, firsttime offenders who more often than not wind up serving the hard time. Meanwhile, the Rockefeller drug laws have led to an explosion in the state's prison population. According to the Correctional Association of New York, the state's prison population has increased five times since the drug laws were enacted a quarter century ago, forcing New Yorkers to build nearly 40,000 new beds at a cost of $4 billion. The association also notes that the majority of the drug inmates are nonviolent offenders a total of 22,000 of the 70,000 prisoners now incarcerated statewide. That's a huge expense for inmates who, in most cases, would likely benefit more from drug treatment than extended prison time. When this issue was raised during the 1997 legislative session, there was reason to hope the governor would join the call for change. Now that he has chosen to keep his distance, others in the Legislature must pick up the challenge and push hard for reform.