Source: Skagit Valley Herald Section: Opinion Editorial (1 LTE,1 Editorial, and 1 comic strip) Pubdate: Friday, October 17,1997 Contact: Email: Skagit Valley Herald, 1000 E. College Way, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Website: http://www.newswest.com/svherald/ Newsroom: (360) 4242160 Greg Lamm Comment: LTE's 200 words max. My letter to the editor just so happened to be on the same page with a Editorial that I wouldn't call very positive, although it does have it's good points. I hope someone will do the honors of sending a LTE in response to the Editorial. " Voters should reject sweeping drug initiative" Initiative 685 (Washington State) might have some merit if it were simply designed to make it legal for patients suffering from cancer, AIDS or other serious diseases to use marijuana for medicinal purposes under a doctor's care. Some medical studies show that marijuana can settle nausea after chemotherapy and stir an appetite in AIDS patients. And scientists are just delving into marijuana's potential for curbing cocaine and heroin addiction. But Initiative 685, which is on the November 4 ballot, is a poorly drafted attempt to decriminalize heroin, cocaine and LSD. It would set aside drug convictions and make many of the state's drug laws unenforceable. Voters should reject the initiative. The measure would legalize possession of marijuana, heroin, LSD and other "Schedule 1" drugs by people who are seriously ill. It says physicians must comply with "professional" medical standards" when recommending such controlled substances, but it doesn't say whose standards should be applied. And it doesn't define "seriously ill." The measure does offer some ideas that deserve more public debate, especially its attempt to promote more drug treatment instead of jail time for people convicted of nonviolent drug crimes. But Initiative 685's vagueness, its broad agenda to legalize drugs and its attack on current drug laws are unacceptable.