Pubdate: Thu, 9 Oct 1997
Source: The Scotsman, Edinburgh, UK 
Website: http://www.scotsman.com
Contact:  JANET BOYLE and JENNY BOOTH

Lollipop test on the way to catch drivers on drugs 

New device to make roads safer, 30 years after the breathalyser was
introduced 

A SUCK on a lollipop by the side of the road could soon help police to
catch drivers on drugs. 

Researchers at Glasgow University are working with a bioscience firm in
Oxfordshire to produce the world's first onthespot roadside saliva drugs
test. 

Police and roads lobby groups say it could be as crucial an invention as
the breathalyser 30 years ago  and fear it will uncover a drugdriving
problem as acute as drinkdriving was then. 

Drivers are asked to give a sample of spit by sucking on an absorbent
lollipop. The police officer then squeezes their saliva into a miniature
"drugalyser", no larger than a mobile phone. The device is calibrated to
test for eight different groups of drugs  including ecstasy and heroin. 

Results are given within five minutes. If the driver is drugs positive, the
police take him or her in for further tests to confirm the roadside reading. 

At present if a police officer suspects that drivers are under the
influence of drugs, they have to be taken back to the police station, where
a medical examiner or police surgeon can examine them and certify whether
or not their judgement is impaired, and administer a blood test. 

If drivers give a negative breath test and it is a busy Saturday night,
officers may judge it is better to allow them to continue on their way
rather than go through the timeconsuming rigmarole of taking them back to
the station. 

The roadside saliva test concept is the brainchild of Dr John Oliver, a
senior lecturer in forensic medicine specialising in toxicology at the
university. 

Dr Oliver said: "This is a userfriendly field test which gives an initial
reading of what a driver may be taking at the time. A backup blood test in
a forensic lab would confirm this. This is the first of its type in the
world." 

The device is being developed by Cozart Bioscience of Abingdon,
Oxfordshire, with Dr Oliver acting as a consultant to doublecheck the
accuracy of the testing kits. The researchers believe that their test will
be the first in the world to identify which drugs are in the body at the
time of driving. 

The process, known as immunoassay, is based on eight separate biochemical
reactions, and works on the ability of each drug group to stimulate a
different immune reaction. 

Because it is a saliva test, only drugs that are active in the bloodstream
and having an effect on the driver show up  unlike urine or sweat tests,
which continue to register traces of drugs such as cannabis in the body
environment long after they have ceased to affect the driver's behaviour. 

Dr Christopher Hand, who set up Cozart four years ago with his brother,
Phil, and friend, Dean Baldwin, believes a prototype of the test will be
available within nine months. 

"We are obviously keeping secret the exact mechanics of how the tests are
devised but we are confident that we are ahead of any others working in the
field," he said. 

"Perhaps the biggest benefit will be to the police in their campaign
against drugs and driving." 

The first year of research and development for the pioneering test was done
with the help of a Department of Trade and Industry Smart Award of
UKP45,000, which covered 75 per cent of the project costs. 

With early signs already positive, says Dr Hand, Cozart is in talks with
major forensic laboratories, and thus indirectly with the police, to
discuss how the test should be packaged. Several prototypes are on the
drawing board. 

The completed test will be able to detect a variety of drugs, including
methadone, amphetamines including ecstasy, benzodiazepines, cocaine,
cannabis, opiates  including heroin and morphine  and barbiturates. 

Comparing the results of the saliva tests with conventional blood tests to
confirm their accuracy, Dr Oliver's team say it is more than 95 per cent
correct. 

In theory the test could even tell the police officer how much of each drug
the driver has in his or her bloodstream, but in practice the test kit will
probably give a digital readout of a simple positive or negative for each
drug group. 

Dr Oliver added: "Initial results are very encouraging and further work is
ongoing." 

Police and drivers' groups have given a warm welcome to work on the
lollipop kit. 

Supt Alastair McLuckie of Strathclyde traffic department said: "If this
proves effective it could contribute a tremendous amount to safety on our
roads. The problem is that while many drivers see drinking as a danger they
do not recognise drugs as a similar one. Effective tests for alcohol have
sent lifesaving messages to drivers and we need the same for drugs." 

Sue Nicholson, a spokeswoman for the RAC in Scotland, said that at present,
police were confronting the same problems with drugdriving as they had
been with drinkdriving 30 years ago  not knowing the size of the problem,
and lacking the tool to find out. 

"We think we are just beginning to uncover the tip of the iceberg, and the
drugdriving problem could be as big a problem as drinkdriving," said Ms
Nicholson. 

"Part of the problem is public attitude  young people who would never
dream of drinking and driving might consider getting into their car after
taking what they consider to be very insignificant drugs. I'm not sure that
they put recreational drugs into the same bracket as alcohol." 

Neil Greig, the roads and environment officer of the AA in Scotland, agreed
that a drugalyser would be a useful new tool, but warned that it was also
important to take into account how much the drugtaker's driving had been
impaired by what he had taken. 

"Lacking an accurate drug test, the police have been talking about
returning to the old prebreathalyser impairment tests of asking drivers to
walk down the white line. 

"It is a good idea  if they are that impaired the chances are they
shouldn't be driving," said Mr Greig. 

The forensic science service estimates that only one driver in eight who
has taken drugs and is pulled up by police is tested for drugs. The rest go
free if they pass the breathalyser test. 

Health experts believe that there are about 200,000 cocaine and heroin
users in UK, and more than 20,000 registered drug addicts. But recreational
drug use is much, much higher, with up to half of young people taking drugs
occasionally.