Source: Waco TribuneHerald Pub ] Date: May 16, 1997 Contact: Disparity (Issue of racism focus on sentencing disparity crack/coke) "To determine whether or not a drug should be controlled, it is important toknow the pattern of abuse of that substance, including the socioeconomic characteristics of the segments of the population involved in such abuse." The Controlled Substances Act 1970. Disparity Your May 5 editorial recommending that the penalty for crack be reduced is right on target. Unfortunately, current drug laws owe their origin to racism rather than justice. Whatever the reasons, crack cocaine use is more common than powder cocaine use in lowincome communities where AfricanAmericans are disproportionately represented. It is no accident that the penalties for crack are stiffer than the penalties for powder. Consider the following. AfricanAmericans represent: 12 percent of the U.S. population 13 percent of drug users 35 percent of arrests for drug possession 55 percent of convictions for drug possession 74 percent of prison sentences for drug possession (Did someone say "disparity?") The constabulary used to enforce drug laws. Now it enforces drug laws. The war on drugs has very little to do with reducing the harm associated with drug use. The war on drugs is not concerned with reducing the number of users. The war on drugs is a war on people. The facts speak for themselves.