Pubdate: Fri, 18 Nov 2016
Source: Victoria Times-Colonist (CN BC)
Copyright: 2016 Times Colonist
Contact:  http://www.timescolonist.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/481
Author: Sarah Petrescu
Page: A4

DRUG-SITE SURVEY PROMPTS CRITICISM

Island Health is responding to criticism over its public consultation
survey on its three supervised injection sites proposed for Victoria.

"We recognize the concerns that have been expressed about the survey
questions, and we agree these concerns are valid," said a statement
posted Thursday on the health authority's website.

Several people complained on social media and to Island Health about
the survey, which asks respondents to say whether they are "a little
bit concerned," "moderately concerned," "very concerned" or "extremely
concerned" about several aspects of the site. It does not offer an
option for registering no concern.

"It's flawed because people are forced to express a level of concern
and it perpetuates the idea that we should all have a level of
concern," said Bruce Wallace, a researcher from the University of
Victoria with expertise on health inequities and vulnerable citizens.

Safe consumption sites are facilities where individuals can go to
inject or consume illicit drugs in a hygienic environment under the
supervision of trained staff. Users bring their own drugs to the
facilities, which often offer other health and social services.

Such sites aim to reduce the number of overdose deaths, connect people
with health-care services and reduce public drug use and the number of
discarded needles.

Island Health is proposing two public sites, one at 941 Pandora Ave.
(next to Our Place Society) and 2920 Bridge St. (near the Rock Bay
Landing shelter), along with a site in a private apartment building at
844 Johnson St.

The survey is part of a public consultation process taking place until
Dec. 2. Public consultation is a requirement of the application for
federal exemption to establish a supervised consumption site.

Wallace noted the survey was modelled on a similar one from Toronto,
which included the question: "Do you have any concerns about the
addition of small-scale supervised injection services?" Only 14 per
cent of respondents answered yes, he said.

"I'm curious why Island Health left this out," he said.

Island Health's Kellie Hudson said the question was not omitted
intentionally.

"We tried to develop a survey that was clear and succinct, one that
would solicit honest and open feedback from the public," she said.
Respondents are able to skip any questions without answering.

The health authority considered amending the survey, but decided
against it as more than 300 people had already responded and because
of the tight timeline.

Hudson noted all feedback will be included in the consultation
package, including that collected via email and online comments and at
town hall meetings.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Matt