URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v16/n606/a05.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Fri, 02 Sep 2016
Source: Sacramento Bee (CA)
Copyright: 2016 The Sacramento Bee
Contact: http://mapinc.org/url/0n4cG7L1
Website: http://www.sacbee.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/376
Author: Dennis A. Hunter
Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v16/n597/a01.html
WILL PROP. 64 IMPROVE STATE?
Re "Bumper crop of pot cash" ( Insight, Aug. 30 ): I think Foon Rhee is
dead on target when he writes that "California's marijuana market is
projected to mushroom from $2.7 billion in 2015 to $6.5 billion by
2020 if recreational pot becomes legal," and "a lot of people are
poised to make a lot of money."
Whenever I'm deciding whether to vote "yes" or "no" on a particular
proposition, I always ask myself in what way the passage or defeat of
that proposition will improve the life, socially and economically, of
the average California citizen. I emphasize the word "improve."
From what I've read and understand, passage of Proposition 64 will
does neither. It is as Rhee writes: A lot of people are poised to
make a lot of money. Vote No on Proposition 64.
Dennis A. Hunter,
Sacramento
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|