URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v16/n600/a02.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Wed, 31 Aug 2016
Source: Colorado Springs Independent (CO)
Column: CannaBiz
Copyright: 2016 Colorado Springs Independent
Contact:
Website: http://www.csindy.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1536
Author: Nat Stein
COUNCIL CRACKS DOWN ON HOMEGROW OPERATIONS - GREEN CHILES, BUBBA KUSH AND ALL
Last week, Colorado Springs City Council passed another new ordinance
that will affect home growers of all stripes.
"I didn't say the word..." Fire Marshal Brett Lacey joked while
presenting it, straightening up to clarify that "this came out of our
dealings with marijuana home grows."
Specifically, the new ordinance, which passed unanimously, targets
intensive indoor grow operations in residential single-family
dwellings and townhomes. Any home grow "utilizing grow lighting shall
be limited to areas of the residence other than kitchens, bathrooms
and/or bedrooms/sleeping rooms" - with an exception for bedrooms as
long as there's another code-compliant one elsewhere in the unit -
and that "a room or an enclosure with grow lighting used for flora
grow, propagation, consumption, or selling shall be limited to 150
square feet aggregate in size per premises."
Any operation exceeding that will be considered a factory occupancy
under the building code, requiring new permits. Acceptable lighting
is limited to LED and CFL bulbs, with possible exceptions at the
discretion of the fire department.
Additionally, the new ordinance prohibits "the manufacture of flora
concentrates, oils or other derivatives involving the use of
compressed flammable gas, flammable gas, flammable liquid, or
combustible liquid as a solvent in a residential setting" as well as
"the storage, use, and/or handling of carbon dioxide, and/or carbon
dioxide systems." Chemicals can be stored on the premises, but not in
habitable areas. Properly permitted ventilation systems are also a must.
Much of that is already in the fire code, Lacey explained, but the
ordinance will provide clarity for the public and enhanced
enforcement capability for his team. "As you know, we've responded to
fires and numerous issues from home grows," he said, citing sub-par
electrical alterations, blown transformers and improper ventilation
that gave way to mold. Basically, he argued that intensive home grows
pose a risk to both first responders and public safety at large - a
premise that council members, the marijuana working group and
citizens are more or less on board with.
He emphasized that the ordinance doesn't single out cannabis grows.
"Say it's not marijuana, say it's green chili - personally that's my
favorite because I'm from the Albuquerque area - so what if I wanted
to grow green chili in my house then sell it at the farmers market,"
Lacey offered. "I've spoken to a number of you about how that's not
appropriate. A home should be a place where we live, eat and sleep -
not a place where we grow an excessive number of plants, and I don't
care what the plant is."
When Lacey presented the ordinance July 25, Councilors Bill Murray
and Keith King had questions about constitutional rights ( albeit from
opposite perspectives ).
King wanted to know whether it's legally permissible for the fire
department to take a preventive approach to enforcement, rather than
just reacting to complaints. Murray voiced concern about selective
enforcement and overly broad inspection authority. "A bigger lasso
sometimes strangles us," as he put it.
Lacey responded that "the fire code is already a pretty powerful
document ... I think if we're very careful with it we have the right
to mitigate any dangerous circumstance."
Lacey indicated he's "confident" that his staff will be able to
handle these new enforcement responsibilities but if not, he'd ask
for more resources.
Reactions to the flora ordinance among the cannabis community are mixed.
Bridgett Dandaraw-Serrit, founder of the Cannabis Patient Rights
Coalition and member of the marijuana working group, expressed
satisfaction. "The way [Lacey] presented it, he said it's not about
the patient grows, it's about the illegal grows. That's the only time
I've heard this city separate the two out," she said, adding that on
behalf of patients, "for the most part, I'm absolutely all for this ordinance."
Jason Warf of the Southern Colorado Cannabis Council took a dimmer
view, calling it an effort "to limit the constitutional rights for a
medical cannabis patient to be able to grow the amount of medicine
recommended by their physician."
Bountifully planted greenhouses remain permissible under the new
ordinance, provided they house green chilies, tomatoes, orchids or
anything that doesn't start with "M" and end with "arijuana." If
that's your flora of choice, don't grow more than 12 plants with a
hefty lock on the door and your doctor's recommendation on hand in
case you get a visit from newly empowered code enforcers.
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|