Pubdate: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 Source: Arizona Republic (Phoenix, AZ) Copyright: 2016 The Arizona Republic Contact: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/sendaletter.html Website: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/24 Authors: Seth Leibsohn and Sheila Polk Note: Seth Leibsohn chairs Arizonans for Responsible Drug Policy. Sheila Polk is the Yavapai County Attorney and vice chair of ARDP. RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA: THE PRICE IS WAY TOO HIGH If insanity is repeatedly doing the same thing and expecting different results, no word better describes the legalization of marijuana for recreational use in Arizona. Colorado and Washington, the first states to do this, have seen increases in teen use of marijuana, traffic fatalities, and emergency room visits (including of toddlers) - all tied to marijuana. In Denver, home of most of the pot shops, more than one in three 11th- and 12th-graders are now regular marijuana users, an increase of 20.5 percent from two years ago, according to the latest Colorado youth survey. Arizona should expect similar results, especially since this initiative is full of protectionism for the marijuana industry. Written by out-of-state lobbyists and Arizona marijuana-business owners, it creates two new government agencies, including a seven-member commission with three members mandated to come from the industry so they can "regulate" themselves. The proponents' claim that this initiative regulates marijuana like alcohol is disingenuous. The alcohol industry doesn't dream of being treated as lightly as this initiative would treat marijuana. At every opportunity to advance public safety, the initiative protects marijuana use instead: Using marijuana under the proposed initiative becomes a legal right. Someone who shows up for work drunk can be disciplined or fired based on an alcohol test. But under this initiative, showing up for work impaired by marijuana would be shielded from discipline until after the commission of an act of negligence or malpractice. Any driver with a blood alcohol content over 0.08 percent is legally drunk. The Arizona law would prohibit a THC limit from ever being set. Penalties for a minor using a fake ID to buy marijuana would be far lower than for his friend who uses a fake ID to buy alcohol. Same for someone selling marijuana to a minor using a fake ID. The experiment in Washington and Colorado shows how disastrous this proposal is. Fatal accidents involving drivers who recently used marijuana more than doubled in Washington in the year after legalization. The rate of people going to Colorado emergency rooms with marijuanarelated symptoms rose 44 percent from 2012 to 2014. Employers there report having to hire out of state for a sober workforce. Just as in Arizona, marijuana's apologists in Colorado and Washington said they wanted to keep marijuana away from children. It didn't work out that way there and it won't be different here. And this is why that matters: Marijuana is "addicting, has adverse effects upon the adolescent brain, is a risk for both cardio-respiratory disease and testicular cancer, and is associated with both psychiatric illness and negative social outcomes," according to the American College of Pediatricians. At what cost? According to the Arizona legislative budget staff, expected revenue from legalizing marijuana could put $30 million into our education system, barely 0.33 percent of what Arizona now spends. Now balance that minimal amount against the costs of treatment, tragic loss of life from traffic fatalities, workplace accidents, or the lost potential of young brains harmed by marijuana. This law would contribute nothing positive to Arizona. Instead it exacts a tremendous cost, all to benefit a handful of marijuana-industry insiders. Arizonans do not need this and will not be able to afford it. The price is too high. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom