URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v16/n468/a01.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Tue, 12 Jul 2016
Source: Sun, The (Yuma, AZ)
Copyright: 2016 The Sun
Contact: http://www.yumasun.com/sections/opinion/submit-letters/
Website: http://www.yumasun.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1258
Author: Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services
ARIZ. COURT: POT SMELL ENOUGH TO OK SEARCH
PHOENIX - Got marijuana? Not legally? Might want to keep the smell down.
A pair of new court rulings Monday allows the police to pursue a
search of your place or your vehicle solely based on the odor.
Attorneys for both men who were convicted based on such searches
argued that the 2010 voter-approved law which allows some people with
certain medical conditions to legally possess or use marijuana means
that the smell alone is no longer evidence that a crime is occurring.
The fact that neither of them was a medical marijuana cardholder, the
lawyers said, is irrelevant.
But Chief Justice Scott Bales, writing for the unanimous court, said
that 2010 law did not legalize the drug for the vast majority of Arizonans.
"The odor of marijuana in most circumstances will warrant a
reasonable person believing there is a fair probability that
contraband or evidence of a crime is present," he wrote.
And Bales specifically rejected the contention that the law - and the
fact some people can possess and use the drug - means that the smell
alone cannot trigger a search.
"Under that view, no person in Arizona would be subject to search or
seizure by state or local police officers based only on an officer
seeing or smelling marijuana," the chief justice said. He said the
2010 law "does not broadly alter the legal status of marijuana but
instead specifies particular rights, immunities, and obligations for
qualifying patients and others, such as designated caregivers."
And the court specifically rejected arguments that a search based
merely on smell runs afoul of state and federal constitutional
provisions protecting the right to privacy.
"The right to privacy ... is not a guarantee against all government
searches and seizures, only unreasonable ones," Bales explained.
That, in turn, gets back to the fact that marijuana use remains
illegal for most of the public, at least for the time being.
The most recent figures from the Arizona Department of Health
Services show there are close to 98,000 people who are legally
qualified to use the drug. ON top of that there are 853 people
certified as "caregivers" plus another 2,625 dispensary agents.
By contrast, the state's population exceeds 6.7 million.
"In this respect, registered qualifying patients are not denied
Fourth Amendment rights or privileges based on their medical
marijuana use," Bales wrote. "They are simply treated like the broader public."
He stressed, though, that police, in deciding whether there is enough
evidence for a search, "cannot ignore indicia of AMMA-compliant
marijuana possession and use that could dispel probable cause."
But David Euchner, a deputy Pima County public defender, said that is
hardly enough to protect individual rights.
"How would you feel if you were the guy using legally and the police
broke into your house and kicked down the door and only later found
out that you had a ( medical marijuana ) card?" he asked. "Now,
according to this decision, they basically are allowed to search
first, ask questions later."
Euchner also said the ruling would appear to allow searches based
solely on smell - especially of vehicles where a warrant is
unnecessary - even if voters approve a ballot measure in November to
allow Arizonans to possess and use marijuana for recreational purposes.
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|