Pubdate: Tue, 24 May 2016 Source: Calgary Herald (CN AB) Page: A13 Copyright: 2016 Postmedia Network Contact: http://www.calgaryherald.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/66 Author: Rob Breakenridge PROSECUTING POT ACTIVIST A WASTE OF TIME There's never a good time to have a pointless case brought before the courts, but doing so in the midst of an acute judge shortage seems rather foolish and counterproductive. Already this year in Alberta, three sexual assault trials have been delayed until 2017 because there are no judges available to hear them. Despite the already considerable strain on the system, though, Vancouver pot activist Dana Larsen is being prosecuted for the apparently heinous crime of giving away marijuana seeds. Larsen was in Calgary last week for a brief initial court appearance, and his case has now been put off until June 10. Whether, or when, it makes it to trial is anyone's guess. Whether it should, though, is another question. Frankly, it's hard to see what we hope to achieve, other than wasting time, money and resources. Larsen is facing one count of trafficking marijuana and one count of possession for the purpose of trafficking - charges serious enough to warrant prison time. The charges were laid last month following Larsen's stop in Calgary as part of his Over-Grow Canada tour. Larsen visited 14 Canadian cities on the tour, spreading his message of marijuana legalization. The tour, though, included an element of civil disobedience. Larsen vowed to give away a million marijuana seeds in the hope that the plants will grow so openly and commonly, it would no longer seem like such a big deal. In 13 of the cities, Larsen handed out his seeds and had no trouble with law enforcement. That wasn't the case in Calgary, however. Five police officers were present that night, and once the seeds were being distributed, Larsen was arrested. As police noted at the time, "under the Canadian Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, it is illegal to distribute marijuana in any form, regardless of whether payment is provided." This is technically true. Also, the Calgary Police Service did not create Alberta's judge shortage, nor does that shortage mean that they stop doing their jobs. However, that's not the only factor in deciding whether charges should be laid and whether the Crown should pursue the case in court. First of all, there's the matter of priorities. There are shops in Calgary that sell marijuana seeds, for example, and clearly police don't see a pressing need to crack down on that. For that matter, the litany of stores selling pipes and bongs and other marijuana paraphernalia are also technically in violation of the law. Despite the clear prohibition on such items, that's surely not on the radar of any police force in this country. So why are Calgary police coming down so hard on Larsen? Or, to put it another way, is this prosecution in the public interest? Even if a clear violation of the law has occurred, it still does not answer the question. As detailed on the Alberta Justice website, "a prosecution may only be commenced or continued if it is in the public interest to do so." This case doesn't appear to meet that test. There's clearly no threat to public safety. The offence does seem trivial, and with Ottawa poised to legalize marijuana, it seems pretty clear that "the law that is alleged to have been breached is obsolete or obscure" - again according to the Alberta Justice website. Further to that, then, the consequences of these charges would be "unduly harsh." Additional factors that speak to public interest include the effect of a prosecution "on public morale and the public's confidence in the justice system," and also the "length and expense of the trial when considered in relation to the seriousness or triviality of the offence." Both of those seem quite relevant here. There is nothing to be accomplished by pursuing this case, and it may just further undermine the system and our faith in it. It's not too late to drop it. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom