URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v16/n330/a05.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Wed, 11 May 2016
Source: Colorado Springs Independent (CO)
Column: Cannabiz
Copyright: 2016 Colorado Springs Independent
Contact:
Website: http://www.csindy.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1536
Author: Nat Stein
COUNCIL CONSIDERS YEAR-LONG MORATORIUM AFTER PROMISING NO EXTENSION
"The moratorium will not be extended" reads a line in the ordinance
that the Colorado Springs City Council passed in late November,
establishing a six-month moratorium on marijuana business licensing.
Now, with that moratorium due to expire on May 25, Council is
considering putting a new one in place - this time for a full year.
"I hear what you're saying, 'It's not an extension; it's a whole new
ordinance.' I got you," Speakeasy Vape Lounge owner and City Council
hopeful Jaymen Johnson said to Council at its April 26 meeting. "It
seems you guys have figured out the loophole thing just as well as
the clubs did, so congratulations. Glad we could show you how it's done."
Sardonic chuckles emanated from the sparse crowd but subsided
quickly. Council was discussing the prospect of reneging on a clear
promise on which many business owners' investments depend.
Councilor Larry Bagley, who chaired the marijuana task force created
by the last moratorium that recommended this new moratorium,
explained the rationale. "We worked for six months now, and that's
almost no time at all," he said. "The future is going to be something
we never thought of. We need to take a little time ... to make some
really good plans going forward..."
The original moratorium was enacted because Council determined that
even though the medical marijuana industry is 15 years old, "a
situation [that affects] the life, health, property and the public
peace exists." Hence the city shouldn't process any land use
applications for medical marijuana facilities ( the only type allowed
in the Springs ) until a task force appointed by Council president
Merv Bennett takes the time to develop some new rules and regulations
to address that situation.
Upon first convening, the task force decided to prioritize health and
safety issues. Determining what those were and what to do about them
was a slow process, but in the end, the 14-member group put forward
four ordinances for Council to consider:
The 12-plant-per-residence limit;
A rezoning of commercial grow houses to use-by-right in industrial
areas with conditional use in some commercial areas;
A split in the mmj-infused product manufacturing license ( MMIP ) into
hazardous - only permitted in industrial zones - and non-hazardous -
conditionally permitted in commercial zones;
And an increase in the mandatory buffer between marijuana businesses
and schools, child-care centers and substance abuse treatment
facilities from 400 to 1,000 feet.
As those proposals work their way through the legislative process,
the task force made a last-minute recommendation for another
year-long moratorium so it can tackle some secondary issues that
didn't count as top priority first time around. That includes things
like co-op caregiver grows, advertising, gifting, co-location ( read:
Gas and Grass ), electric and water usage, odor control and
420-friendly vacation rentals.
Green Pharm owner Dale Hecht was one of the few pro-cannabis task
force members. Though he's satisfied with what came out of the group,
he argued that going through the same song and dance again would be pointless.
"Did we get every issue covered? Absolutely not," he said. "Would we
get every issue covered in the next year? I'd say absolutely not.
Even if we had a 10-year moratorium, you won't get every issue
covered because this is a fluid industry."
Others argued that stifling such a "fluid" industry would run counter
to the free market principles which nearly everyone in the room professed.
On a nuts-and-bolts level, Dan Rial - president of the Pikes Peak
Mechanical Contractors Association - said, "There's a lot of money
being brought into the city [through] taxes, permits, architecture,
construction and design. ... If you put a moratorium, we'll lose
jobs." What gets built in the city, he argued, should be dictated by
demand, not by artificial limits.
A Wellness Centers owner Tom Scudder, who also served on the task
force, was the first to propose the new moratorium, though he has
since clarified that he'd prefer a hard cap on licenses ( as Denver
now has ). He pointed out that the Springs, though it has just over 8
percent of the state's population, has more than a quarter of the
state's dispensaries. Those dispensaries, however, serve customers
from all over southern and eastern Colorado, where various
jurisdictions have outlawed marijuana sales of any kind.
"I believe in the free market, " Scudder said. "But we need to be
real that we don't have a free market here."
Johnson of the Vape Lounge noted that government regulations are
already squeezing consumers, especially patients. "Combined with the
ordinance against grows, you're strong-arming patients to go to these
dispensaries," Johnson said, acknowledging there were two ( three
depending how you count it ) pro-cannabis task force members who had a
hand in crafting these regulations. But, he noted, "to say that
dispensary owners have the best will of consumers in mind is a little
like letting Walmart decide what happens with food stamps and where
you can spend them."
Tonya Garduno of the Southern Colorado Cannabis Council was blunt:
"There's no reason to do this unless you want to destroy the
industry, which is what I think is truly happening."
After some procedural jockeying, Council voted 5-3 in favor of
adopting the ordinance. Councilors Bill Murray, Helen Collins and
Keith King were in the minority. Second reading was scheduled for May
10, after the Indy's press deadline.
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|