URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v16/n298/a03.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Sat, 30 Apr 2016
Source: Turlock Journal (CA)
Copyright: 2016 The Turlock Journal
Contact:
Website: http://www.turlockjournal.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3816
Author: Dennis Wyatt
CALIFORNIA: IS IT THE NEXT STONER STATE?
Jerry Brown a few years back was asked to comment on the drive to
legalize recreational use of pot in California.
The governor responded by indicating a "stoner state" may not be
conducive to the California economy.
Brown's ultimate stance on a pending ballot measure drive to legalize
the consumption of cannabis might end up being different but the
point can't be ignored. There are inherit risks with a workforce that
is less than optimum in today's competitive world even if every user
simply "mellows" as the more starry-eyed proponents of unrestricted
marijuana use claim.
But perhaps more important is the pushback coming from the private
sector and law enforcement that may make legal use of marijuana
beyond medicinal purposes the equivalent of walking into the Brea Tar
Pits for many people. And the dangers ironically are associated with
the fans of universal marijuana who contend it is no different than
smoking cigarettes or consuming alcohol.
Democrat Jim Wood - an assemblyman from Healdsburg - has gotten his
measure AB2300 out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee Monday on a 10-0 vote.
AB2300 assures landlords would have the same authority to prohibit
smoking medicinal pot in a rented residence as they now do with
smoking tobacco cigarettes. Patients would be able to retain the
right to access and use medical pot by other means such as edibles
and oils. It means vast bi-partisan support exists in Sacramento to
apply the same restrictions to recreational pot. That means landlords
will have the right to evict those who violate state law regardless
of what they smoke.
The legislation is based in part on studies that do indeed show that
pot is much like cigarettes when it comes to second-hand smoke.
According to University of California San Francisco Professor of
Medicine Matthew Springer, "Tobacco and marijuana share thousands of
chemicals that result from burning dried plant material, and many of
these chemicals are harmful. The adverse cardiovascular effects of
secondhand marijuana smoke have only recently begun to be studied and
we are seeing just a few minutes of exposure to secondhand smoke from
tobacco and marijuana have the same negative effect on the ability of
arteries to carry enough blood, with marijuana causing longer-lasting
effect than tobacco."
Can anyone say stroke and heart attacks?
Such studies, of course, would set the stage for insurance companies
to monetarily penalize marijuana smokers just as they have cigarette
smokers when it comes to premiums and deductibles.
And once you take pot from special medicinal status for smoking to
essentially giving it equal billing with cigarettes you've opened the
door for justified punitive actions from insurance companies.
As for those who think legalizing pot makes it legal period, let's
not forget how the backers of recreational pot astutely point out it
is no different than alcohol. Colorado's lawmakers are virtually
unanimous - as are the courts - in keeping intact the right of
employers to conduct drug tests for marijuana use based on concerns
it impacts motor skills much like alcohol does when it relaxes a user.
Given marijuana can stay in the system for as long as 30 days users
would be putting their jobs or their chances of getting one at risk.
Driving under the influence already includes much more than alcohol
given how prescription and illegal drugs can impair judgment and
impact motor skills. Make pot legal and it'll be just a matter of
time before a breath-analyzer test is developed to determine the role
marijuana smoking may have in unsafe driving.
Those pushing for legalization of marijuana who believe it will
actually decriminalize it by dropping all penalties for its use
should be prepared for what they always wished - to have it
officially treated no different than alcohol and smoking.
Legalizing pot will open the door for users to be subjected to higher
insurance rates, smoking restrictions and a whole list of other pushbacks.
True they exist now but it is way off base to think they go away
after pot is legalized. They'll likely to discover the opposite will
happen with penalties beyond that now exists will expand. Those that
think California's super hyper regulatory environment that makes the
state's criminal justice system look minor league in comparison won't
go into overdrive once pot is legalized must be smoking the real good stuff.
California has already for all practical purposes effectively
decriminalized marijuana use when the state reduced possession of a
small amount to a misdemeanor
Legalizing non-medical use of marijuana is far from being a panacea
that supporters are pitching.
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|