URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v16/n076/a06.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Sun, 07 Feb 2016
Source: Palm Beach Post, The (FL)
Copyright: 2016 The Palm Beach Post
Contact:
Website: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/333
AS GOVERNMENT DRAGS ITS FEET, VOTERS MOVE ON MEDICAL POT
After utterly failing to bring relief even to children with severe
epilepsy through a non-narcotic form of marijuana, Florida officials
fully deserve the wrath of voters who are on the way to taking
matters into their own hands - with a constitutional amendment that
would make marijuana available for a wide range of debilitating
medical conditions.
The medical marijuana amendment has gained enough signatures to
qualify for the November ballot. It is sponsored by the same folks
who fell just short with a similar amendment in 2014. Then, the
measure got 58 percent of the vote. This time - in a higher-turnout,
presidential election year - the chances of gaining the needed 60
percent seem in the bag.
Organizer John Morgan, the Orlando attorney bankrolling the effort,
sure thinks so. While his 2014 effort focused on the young-person
vote, this year he'll educate seniors. They are a natural
constituency for a measure allowing people with cancer, glaucoma and
other serious, common afflictions to ask their doctor to prescribe
medical marijuana, a remedy that is rapidly losing the stigma it once had.
Unlike 2014, Attorney General Pam Bondi has not come out against the
amendment. Proponents tightened 2014 language that had been depicted
as "loopholes" by opponents who feared the spread of drug use.
A solid 68 percent of Florida voters surveyed last July said they are
willing to vote yes to medical marijuana, according to a survey by
St. Pete Polls.
"If we can pass this, 400,000 really sick and terminally ill people
will benefit from day one," Morgan said recently.
We are on record as saying that adding a medical-marijuana clause to
the Florida Constitution is a poor way to govern. Statutory solutions
are always preferable for addressing fast-moving and often volatile
issues like this one. But the Legislature shows no sign of moving at
anywhere near the pace of the popular will.
In 2014 lawmakers passed, and Gov. Rick Scott signed, a "Charlotte's
Web" law, which legalizes the use of a non-euphoric strain of
marijuana of that name to treat dire conditions such as epilepsy, ALS
and cancer. Yet sufferers with these conditions have seen not a drop
of the promised drug while an achingly slow bureaucratic and
regulatory process trudges along.
Charlotte's Web was supposed to be available a year ago. But three
judges had to wade through 30,000 pages of applications to select
five vendors to grow, process and distribute the newly legal weed, in
different parts of the state. The process survived two legal
challenges. But just last week, three of the losing nurseries filed
suit to at least temporarily block competitors from starting
production. And so the medication is still months away.
Last week , a state Senate committee passed a bill ( SB 460 ) that
would OK medical marijuana for people with terminal illnesses.
Tellingly, most of the debate would dwell on the delays with
Charlotte's Web. Sens. Jeff Clemens, D-Lake Worth, and Joseph
Abruzzo, D-Boynton Beach, proposed amendments to speed up the 2014
regulatory framework, such as boosting the number of vendors. But as
Sen. Gwen Margolis, D-Miami, said, the state is "not there yet." The
amendments lost.
Twenty-three states permit medical cannabis use, and three more are
poised to advance medical laws this year. We bet that will be four
more, as Florida voters do what their government is too timid to do:
make it legal for people with debilitating illness to ease their
pain, nausea, appetite loss or anxiety.
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|