URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v16/n005/a03.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Sun, 03 Jan 2016
Source: Seattle Times (WA)
Copyright: 2016 The Associated Press
Contact:
Website: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/409
Author: Kristen Wyatt, the Associated Press
POT INDUSTRY'S BRANDING EFFORTS ARE MOVES TOWARD MAINSTREAM
Name-Dropping
But Entrepreneurs Are Operating Without Any Legal Protection
We're in a new industry, where the benefits of federal protection
aren't open to us." CEO of LivWell, a 10-store chain of Colorado
marijuana shops
DENVER ( AP ) - Snoop Dogg has his own line of marijuana. So does
Willie Nelson. Melissa Etheridge has a marijuana-infused wine.
As the fast-growing marijuana industry emerges from the black market
and starts looking like a mainstream industry, there's a scramble to
brand and trademark pot products.
The celebrity endorsements are just the latest attempt to add cachet
to a line of weed. Snoop Dogg calls his eight strains of weed "Dank
From the Doggfather Himself." Nelson's yet-to-bereleased line says
the pot is "born of the awed memories of musicians who visited
Willie's bus after a show."
The pot industry's makeshift branding efforts, from celebrity names
on boxes of weed to the many weed-themed T-shirts and stickers common
in towns with a legal marijuana market, show the industry taking
halting steps toward the mainstream.
Problem is, those weed brands aren't much more substantial than the
labels they're printed on. Patents and trademarks are largely
regulated by the federal government, which considers marijuana an
illegal drug and therefore ineligible for any sort of legal protection.
The result is a Wild West environment of marijuana entrepreneurs
trying to stake claims and establish cross-state markets using a
patchwork of state laws.
Consumers have no way of knowing that celebrity-branded pot is any
different from what they could get in a plastic baggie from a corner
drug dealer.
"You can't go into federal court to get federal benefits if you're a
drug dealer," said Sam Kamin, a University of Denver law professor
who tracks marijuana law.
That doesn't mean that the pot business isn't trying.
Hundreds of marijuana-related patents have likely been requested from
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, according to those who work in
the industry. Exact numbers aren't available because pending patent
information isn't public.
So far, federal authorities have either ignored or rejected marijuana
patent and trademark requests, as in the 2010 case of a California
weed-delivery service that applied to trademark its name, "The Canny Bus."
"They haven't issued a single patent yet. But generally speaking,
there is broad agreement within the patent law community that they
will," said Eric Greenbaum, chief intellectual property officer for
Vireo Health, which is seeking a patent for a strain of marijuana to
treat seizures.
Companies like Vireo are betting that if marijuana becomes legal
nationally, they will be first in line to claim legal ownership of
whichever type of marijuana they have already developed.
Pot companies also are filing state-level trademarks, thereby
avoiding the snag in a federal trademark application: the requirement
that the mark is used in interstate commerce, which remains
off-limits for pot companies.
In Colorado, for example, there are nearly 700 trade names and 200
trademarks registered that include the word "marijuana" or a synonym,
Kamin said.
Pot producers also are claiming everything they can that doesn't
involve actual weed. So a marijuana company could trademark its logo
or patent a process for packaging something, without mentioning that
the "something" is marijuana.
The marijuana industry certainly has been on the receiving end of
legal threats from other companies that do have trademark and patent
protection. Cease-and-desist letters aren't uncommon in the mailboxes
of marijuana companies, whether it's for making a candy that looks
like a nonintoxicating brand or for selling a type of pot that
includes a trademarked word or phrase in its name.
The Girl Scouts of the U.S.A., for example, says it has sent dozens
of cease-anddesist letters to those selling a popular strain of pot
known as Girl Scout Cookies or another called Thin Mints.
"The use of our trademarks in connection with drugs tarnishes the
Girl Scouts name," the organization says in the letter it has sent to
pot sellers primarily in California, Colorado and Washington.
Last year, Hershey sued two marijuana companies in Colorado and
Washington for selling "Reefer's" peanut butter cups and "Dabby
Patty" candies, which resembled Hershey's Reese's Peanut Butter Cups
and York peppermint patties. Both pot companies agreed to stop
selling the products and destroy any remaining inventory.
But the industry can't use those same laws to protect its own brands.
"We're in a new industry, where the benefits of federal protection
aren't open to us," said John Lord, CEO of LivWell, a 10-store chain
of Colorado marijuana shops that recently entered an agreement to
sell Leafs By Snoop, the entertainer's new line of marijuana.
LivWell grows the Snoop pot alongside many other strains but charges
up to $175 more an ounce for the rapper's brand, which is sold from
behind a glittery instore display.
"Brand differentiation is the normal progression of events," said
Lord, who wouldn't share sales figures on the Snoop pot but says its
performance has been "outstanding."
"Consumers will see more and more of this in the future."
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|