Pubdate: Wed, 16 Dec 2015
Source: Globe and Mail (Canada)
Copyright: 2015 The Globe and Mail Company
Contact:  http://www.theglobeandmail.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/168
Author: Dan Malleck
Note: Associate professor of health sciences at Brock University; 
author of When Good Drugs Go Bad
Page: A11

WHY IT MAKES SENSE TO HAVE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARDS SELL POT

Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne says the provincial liquor control 
board is the best way to sell marijuana. Manitoba Premier Greg 
Selinger made the same comment last month. The Ontario and British 
Columbia governments' employees unions have also called for it to be 
sold through liquor retailers.

Some may ask, what have they been smoking? But based on why Canada 
developed these boards in the first place, the premiers have a good 
case. Are liquor boards the best way to distribute cannabis?

Yes, and here's why: Liquor control boards were created so provinces 
could manage the legalization of another recreational drug, alcohol.

When Prohibition gripped Canada a century ago, liquor was used 
medicinally as well as recreationally. But many saw it as a terrible 
social danger. Under Prohibition (which most provinces implemented 
during the First World War), to consume alcohol non-medically was to 
consort with criminals. This led to problems such as violent criminal 
networks expanding trade and protecting turf.

Similarities to cannabis as a medicinal, recreational and criminally 
enriching substance are clear. Nevertheless, there are some key differences.

Alcohol was criminalized at a time when many people enjoyed it, and 
banning it proved to be unworkable. Conversely, when cannabis was 
criminalized, relatively few Canadians consumed it. But as pot 
smoking became widespread, the demand enriched drug-trafficking 
networks that had been in place for decades, moving cocaine and 
opiates across borders.

If this illegality heightened pot's appeal to the "counterculture," 
it also reinforced sinister stereotypes of the plant. Consider 
Stephen Harper's statement during the election campaign that 
marijuana is "infinitely worse" than tobacco. Research actually shows 
this to be far from the case, yet the former prime minister's 
mistaken assertion is understandable. When something is illegal, it 
is easy to believe that it is inherently dangerous.

So how to legalize something so laden with negative baggage?

When legalizing liquor after Prohibition, provincial control systems 
oversaw its distribution and sale, while licensing and inspecting 
manufacturers. Although liquor boards are now widely reviled, they 
played an essential role in negating fears about social disorder that 
were at the heart of the prohibitionist message. Government 
management contradicted the widely held belief that booze would 
destroy society.

So those advocates of liquor control systems managing cannabis sales 
have historical precedent. With pot, as with liquor, government 
management of distribution and oversight of its manufacture would 
help promote a moderationist approach that should address problems 
quickly while calming fears that the world is coming to an end.

Cannabis is less problematic than alcohol. It usually makes users 
mellow rather than belligerent, and doesn't wreak such havoc on the 
body. Users would be subject to no-smoking bylaws, regulations would 
restrict the age of consumers, technology for detecting 
cannabis-impaired driving is advancing and decriminalization would 
decouple this mild intoxicant from networks pushing far more 
dangerous chemicals.

Factor in tax revenue, lower policing costs, the undermining of 
illegal traffickers and the fact that people who consume legal drugs 
are less reluctant to disclose their use if they develop problems 
such as addiction, and legalization provides far more benefits than risks.

Provincial liquor systems, however disliked they may be, have nearly 
a century of experience controlling the distribution of that other 
psychoactive substance. Adding marijuana to their mandate would mean 
an established control infrastructure could manage away the worst 
features of cannabis consumption that are rooted in its illegality.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom