Pubdate: Thu, 10 Sep 2015
Source: Sacramento News & Review (CA)
Column: The 420
Copyright: 2015 Chico Community Publishing, Inc.
Contact:  http://newsreview.com/sacto/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/540
Author: Ngaio Bealum

ADDING UP THE GREEN

First, a disclaimer: I used to smoke pot back in the '60s and '70s. 
During that time, I worked a 40-hour week, drove four hours per night 
to school, spent three hours a night in class and graduated with my 
Masters in six years.

Like many at the time, I segued into the socially acceptable 
cigarette-and-alcohol mode. Remarkably, at the time, we all "knew pot 
would be legal within a few years." Here we are decades later, and 
we're still dealing with the absurdities of deciding what drugs 
adults can or can't consume.

I was just reading today that by May, Colorado had collected more 
than $88 million in marijuana taxes in 2015, without any increase in 
drug-related crime. I also read that our state government is 
scratching their collective heads trying to figure out how to 
increase taxes on gas and cars in order to rebuild our disgusting 
infrastructure, roads, highways and etc. California has more than 
seven times the population of Colorado. Simple math would indicate 
that if our state would simply follow Colorado's lead and policies 
(thereby relieving the Fed's attention to our businesses, and 
relieving the strain on our courts and jails), we should generate a 
total of $1.5 billion per year in tax revenues. For some reason, the 
puritans in our government balk at such a simple answer.

- -John B. Egan

Thank you for reading my column.

I agree with you, although I am not sure your numbers are correct.

It is incredibly obvious that California could use some weed money, 
although I suspect the tax revenues might be a little lower than $1.4 
billion. (I found a chart here: http://tinyurl.com/statetax revenue.) 
But even $500 million, the total predicted by the chart, would go a 
long way to helping this great state of ours.

The question is, who is going to get the money?

The cops and law enforcement will want a cut because they stand to 
lose a chunk of money if they can no longer arrest and jail and fine 
people for using cannabis. (They will also have to be less racist if 
they can't harass minorities for pot, but I digress.) The schools 
need money, because California has its priorities effed up and we 
spend more money on prisons than we do on schools.

And also, if you say the weed money will go to the schools, people 
will be more inclined to vote yes (we hope). I'm not sure if there 
will be any left over for roads.

I feel like trucking companies and delivery services and 
petrochemical corporations should pay for the roads anyway, seeing as 
they need them the most.

But, whatevs.

The Legislature can't even get it together enough to pass medical 
cannabis legislation (Assembly Bills 266 and 243 are still in limbo, 
and getting worse as we go along), so I have no faith in its ability 
to pass recreational regulations. Thank Jah for the initiative process.

Maybe the people can pass a good law in 2016.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom