URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v15/n290/a07.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 1
Pubdate: Tue, 26 May 2015
Source: Palm Beach Post, The (FL)
Copyright: 2015 The Palm Beach Post
Contact:
Website: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/333
Authors: Christopher J. Coyne and Abigail R. Hall
Note: Christopher J. Coyne is coeditor of The Independent Review,
journal of The Independent Institute (independent.org), Oakland,
Calif. Abigail R. Hall is research fellow at The Independent
Institute. They wrote this for Inside Sources.
HOW MIDDLE AMERICA POLICE TURNED INTO SOLDIERS
We've all seen videos of Third World "police" in combat gear putting
down demonstrations by physically assaulting protesters, turning
heavy equipment and tear gas on them, or shooting into crowds. That's
what makes the recent events in Baltimore all the more disturbing.
This time the "peace officers" in military combat gear, brandishing
military-grade weapons and perched on armored military vehicles, were ours.
No one knows what the Baltimore protests will look like in the coming
days, though the criminal charges filed against six police officers
in the homicide of Freddie Gray may have a calming effect. But the
recent violence there and elsewhere has brought long-overdue
attention to an important national development that had all but been
ignored: the militarization of our police.
Over the past two decades, police departments across the country have
acquired large quantities of military equipment and have dramatically
increased their use of such questionable tactics as "no-knock" raids.
As citizens consider the merits of this trend, it is crucial to
understand its origins.
Police militarization can be traced primarily to two policies: the
"War on Drugs" and the "War on Terror." Throughout the 1970s and
1980s, concerns over drug use prompted calls for local, state and
federal law enforcement to step up efforts to curtail the drug trade.
Interdiction and enforcement thus became the justification for
increased policing resources.
At first, the response was mostly more of the usual conventional methods.
Then, in 1981, Congress passed the Military Cooperation with Law
Enforcement Act ( MCLEA ), which allowed the Department of Defense to
offer training, intelligence, vehicles and equipment to domestic
police forces to combat drugs.
This included items ranging from small handguns and night-vision
goggles to armored cars, tanks, assault weapons and aircraft.
The impact of MCLEA was swift.
By 1982, 59 percent of law-enforcement agencies maintained police
paramilitary units or Special Weapons and Tactics units, according to
Peter Kraska, an expert on militarization at the University of
Kentucky. He found that more than 89 percent of police departments
had a PPU by 1995.
The militarization accelerated following the terrorist attacks of
Sept. 11, 2001, when the war on terror began.
The federal government directed millions in cash and equipment to
local police forces to combat the terrorist threat.
One example of this expansion can be seen in DoD's 1997 Excess
Property Program 1033, which allows the transfer of military
equipment to local police.
This was an offer the police couldn't refuse.
By 2010, some $212 million in military equipment was being
transferred to local police annually - a number that more than
doubled, to $450 million, by 2013. Similar programs are operated by
the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department.
The military-style police response we've witnessed in Baltimore and
elsewhere should cause us all great concern.
Police militarization has helped transform our country into a
battlefield, where U.S. citizens are viewed not as civilians presumed
innocent until proven guilty of a crime but as enemies.
Officers are trained to think of their patrols, not as their
communities, but as "battlefields." In fact, an internal memo to the
Ferguson, Mo., police department, described protesters as "enemy
forces" and "adversaries."
We need to change direction.
An initial step would be to end the 1033 program and similar
initiatives that encourage the transfer of military equipment to the
police, rather than dial it back as President Barack Obama did last
week. Citizens also should reconsider the costs along with any
benefits of providing police forces with military-style assault training.
Moreover, it's time to seriously reconsider the larger policies under
which police militarization occurred and expanded. Stated simply,
demilitarizing police would require nothing short of scaling down or
drastically altering the wars on drugs and terror.
The shift in police mentality has blurred the distinction between
police and the military, between law enforcement and combat.
The result is an erosion of the liberties we enjoy as Americans.
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|