Pubdate: Thu, 05 Feb 2015
Source: Alaska Dispatch News (AK)
Column: Highly Informed
Copyright: 2015 Alaska Dispatch Publishing
Contact:  http://www.adn.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/18
Note: Anchorage Daily News until July '14
Author: Scott Woodham

WHAT ABOUT MEDICAL MARIJUANA AFTER POT BECOMES LEGAL IN ALASKA?

First a bit of Highly Informed housekeeping. Thank you to everyone 
who sent in a question. We had planned on starting off with a few of 
our own questions, but the response was so great right from the start 
that we've put them on the shelf and started on yours. Thanks for 
sending them in, and please keep them coming.

Today's installment focuses on three medical marijuana questions. 
Theresa's question is up first.

I am a medical marijuana patient. My card is going to expire soon. Do 
I need to renew it?

Naturally, you're free to decide on your own in consultation with 
your doctor. There isn't a requirement to renew, and the initiative 
to legalize recreational cannabis did not change anything about 
Alaska's medical marijuana laws. For a few reasons, however, you 
should consider renewing on the side of caution, especially if your 
health condition means you need continuous access to medicine, or you 
have designated a caregiver growing for you. If your card expires, so 
does your designated caregiver's permission to grow for you.

The initiative to legalize, tax and regulate did not distinguish 
between medical and "recreational" cannabis. Alaska's medical system 
remains unchanged by Ballot Measure 2. If you're obtaining medicine 
now, losing your card might disrupt that access or cause you to seek 
black-market sources. Because there are no dispensaries in Alaska, 
there is still no way for patients to legally fill their 
prescriptions with a purchase. It must be grown by the patient or a 
caregiver, but there is so far no legal avenue to obtain seeds or 
cuttings to grow.

Even though Ballot Measure 2 will soon take effect and legalize 
limited possession and growth of marijuana, medical patients will 
still need access to medicine. Any patients considering letting a 
card expire should take their own needs into account along with the 
fact that the state does not expect a legal retail market to be ready 
anytime very soon.

Alaska Dispatch News' Suzanna Caldwell reported this week that 
regulators expect retail stores to be ready to operate by May 26, 
2016, but there are some big potential variables in the timeline. If 
you're sick, that's a lot of time to wait before you can legally 
purchase medicine without a card. After Feb. 24, individuals will be 
free to grow six plants at a time, three of them immature, but 
depending on dosage requirements or home garden limitations, that may 
not be enough to meet a patient's needs.

But all those reasons assume that someone holds a medical card for 
entirely medical reasons. Which brings us to our next reader 
question, from Pam.

After legalization day, will there be an advantage to having an 
Alaska medical marijuana card?

The answer is yes and no. No, because soon it won't be necessary to 
get a medical card to have peace of mind for possession or growth on 
a small scale in cases where marijuana use may not always be strictly 
medical. But soon, that peace of mind will apply to everyone who's 
within the limits of the law.

For people who have a medical need, though, having a card does come 
with advantages that people dealing with illness would do well to 
consider. Among other reasons, a medical card would be necessary for 
any patients under the age of 21, the legal age for purchase or 
possession under the initiative. Also, some patients may need to 
purchase or possess more medicine than state or local laws may allow 
them to have after the new laws have finished settling down at the 
state and local levels.

Another advantage may come in the future, but there's no way to tell 
just yet. Some mention has been made in legislative hearings this 
week about the idea of creating a separate set of controls taxation 
for any medical market that may be established here, but nothing like 
that has been made concrete yet. Precedent for a two-tiered system 
exists in Colorado, where differences between medical and 
recreational include things like the number of doses or strength of 
some products, like infused edibles, and lower taxes on medical 
cannabis. Washington's medical market is also separate from its 
non-prescription retail market, and that is the subject of strong 
debate right now.

Also worth taking into account if a two-tiered system were created in 
Alaska, some highly potent products may end up being restricted in 
the recreational market past the point of utility or convenience for 
medical patients whose needs may surpass most other cannabis users. 
But that's all up in the air right now.

Because the initiative did not distinguish medical marijuana, nothing 
will change unless regulators or lawmakers address the situation. 
There is still no way in Alaska for patients to legally purchase 
medical marijuana or compensate a caregiver to grow it for them. 
There is also still no legal avenue to obtain seeds or cuttings to 
grow for medical purposes. To me, it seems a cruel twist that 
recreational users are poised to become the first legal purchasers of 
marijuana in Alaska, but medical patients still await relief from a 
medical system that makes access to medicine very difficult.

Our next question comes from Paul.

Does medical marijuana lose its medicinal value if smoke containing 
carcinogens and other chemicals is the delivery system?

The short answer is no. People still have medical uses for cannabis, 
and some patients do take their medicine via smoke. There's more to it, though.

Cannabis smoke does contain chemicals, and some of them are known to 
be harmful, but science is still trying to figure out the long-term 
risks of varying levels of use. For many medical patients, the 
benefits generally outweigh the possible risks.

People use cannabis, for instance, to endure the misery of 
chemotherapy to treat life-threatening cancer. Others use it to 
control chronic pain or neurological symptoms. And those are just a 
few of the reasons people might seek a prescription. Cases like that 
seem to me to clearly outweigh the long-term risks, but everyone's 
situation is different.

The question of dangers associated with smoking is somewhat moot for 
many many medical patients, however. Patients who require frequent or 
large doses usually don't take their medicine by smoking it because, 
among other reasons, it would first be too irritating to their lungs. 
For that reason, many patients medicate using vaporization, marijuana 
concentrates or infused edible products, to say nothing of tinctures, 
creams and so on. Alternatives to smoking aren't without potential 
risks themselves, but they do bypass some of the main problems 
associated with smoking.

Have a question about marijuana news or culture in Alaska? Send it to  with "Highly Informed" in the subject line.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom