URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v14/n051/a10.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Tue, 14 Jan 2014
Source: Republican & Herald (PA)
Copyright: 2014 The Washington Post
Contact:
Website: http://republicanherald.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1047
Author: Ruth Marcus
Note: Marcus is a writer for The Washington Post
THE PERILS OF LEGALIZED POT
Marijuana legalization may be the same-sex marriage of 2014 - a trend
that reveals itself in the course of the year as obvious and
inexorable. At the risk of exposing myself as the fuddy-duddy I seem
to have become, I hope not.
This is, I confess, not entirely logical and a tad hypocritical. At
the risk of exposing myself as not the total fuddy-duddy of my
children's dismissive imaginings, I have done my share of inhaling,
though back in the age of bellbottoms and polyester.
Next time I'm in Colorado, I expect, I'll check out some Bubba Kush.
Why not? They used to warn about pot being a gateway drug, but the
only gateway I'm apt to be heading through at this stage is the one to Lipitor.
Still, widespread legalization is a bad idea, if an inevitable
development. Washington state is the next to light up, in a few
months. A measure is heading to the ballot in Alaska this year, along
with measures in Oregon and California. As with gambling - also a bad
idea, by the way - more states are certain to feel the peer pressure
for tax dollars and tourist revenue.
I'm not arguing that marijuana is riskier than other, already legal
substances, namely alcohol and tobacco. Indeed, pot is less
addictive; an occasional joint strikes me as no worse than an
occasional drink. If you had a choice of which of the three
substances to ban, tobacco would have to top the list. Unlike pot and
alcohol, tobacco has no socially redeeming value; used properly, it
is a killer.
So the reason to single out marijuana is the simple fact of its
current ( semi- )illegality. On balance, society will not be better off
with another mind-altering legal substance. In particular, our kids
will not be better off with another mind-altering legal substance.
As the American Medical Association concluded in recommending against
legalization last November, "Cannabis is a dangerous drug and as such
is a public health concern." The association added: "It is the most
common illicit drug involved in drugged driving, particularly in
drivers under the age of 21. Early cannabis use is related to later
substance use disorders."
And this point, for me, is the most convincing: "Heavy cannabis use
in adolescence causes persistent impairments in neurocognitive
performance and IQ, and use is associated with increased rates of
anxiety, mood, and psychotic thought disorders."
Please do not argue that Colorado's law, like those proposed
elsewhere, bans sales to those under 21. Hah! I have teenage
children. The laws against underage drinking represent more challenge
to overcome than barrier to access.
And although alcohol seems the teen drug of choice among the
adolescents I know, the more widely available marijuana becomes, the
more minors will use it.
And it's not as if the kids need encouragement. By the time they have
graduated from high school, nearly half have tried smoking pot; 16.5
percent of eighth-graders have. More alarming, the number who
perceive great risk from regular use has been plummeting, from 58
percent to 40 percent among 12th-graders, according to a study funded
by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Given changing public attitudes - for the first time last year, a
majority of Americans supported legalization - Colorado and
Washington are apt to be the vanguard states, not the outliers.
If this doesn't make you nervous, you are smoking something. Maybe even legally.
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|