Pubdate: Thu, 09 Jan 2014
Source: Record, The (Kitchener, CN ON)
Copyright: 2014 Metroland Media Group Ltd.
Contact:  http://www.therecord.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/225
Author: Jay Ambrose (Jay Ambrose is the former director of editorial policy
for Scripps Howard Newspapers, and was editor of The Rocky Mountain 
News in Denver and the El Paso-Herald Post. (McClatchy-Tribune 
McClatchy-Tribune News Service)

WATCH COLORADO'S POT EXPERIMENT WITH CAUTION

I live in Colorado's Rocky Mountains, and I am high, but
wait.

I mean my house is 2,400 metres above sea level, not that I am giddily
under the influence of marijuana legally purchased as a result of a
historic development that could someday cause a teenager to think his
TV is sending him secret messages.

What I am talking about is Colorado becoming the first U.S. state to
allow the selling of recreational pot without threat of criminal
proceedings or the laughable excuse that it is for medicinal purposes
only.

The commercial fest got underway Jan. 1. People gathered early at 37
licensed stores, the lines were long, the waits were as much as five
hours, the purchasers came from as far as Ohio, the prices were
wallet-shredding, the first day's take was $1 million and the first
year's take is expected to be $258 million.

All this was made possible by a 2012 constitutional amendment passed
with 55 per cent of the vote. The venture is intensely regulated and
heavily taxed.

Purchasers have to be 21 or older. They can buy no more than an ounce.
They cannot consume in public. They cannot transport the drug across
state lines.

Although federal law still prohibits pot use, Barack Obama's
administration has said it will mostly look the other way.

It's thought Colorado is a gateway state and others will follow suit.
The state of Washington is set to go next year.

The justifications? There are a number. One is that the U.S. war on
drugs has imprisoned people for minor infractions and has helped
generate and sustain drug-dealing crime of a frightening, bloody
reach. Another is that we Americans should have the freedom to do what
we like as long as we aren't hurting others; after all, it is argued,
alcohol is legal. Still another point is that the economy and
government coffers will be pleasantly blessed.

Our incarceration rate - the highest in the world - is indeed a
horror, and rehab is a better answer to drug abuse than jail. But
marijuana use is no longer treated a fraction as harshly as once upon
a time - sometimes all you get is the equivalent of a parking ticket -
and such powerfully punishing drugs as cocaine, heroin and meth are
still illegal everywhere in this land. They and some of their cousins
are surely enough to keep the criminal drug biz busy.

Liberty in the pursuit of pleasure seems to appeal to a wider
ideological swath than freedom from too much government generally, but
that's not the end of the world even if the comparison to alcohol is
the end of careful thinking.

Booze is much more embedded in our culture than pot, meaning its
prohibition was a much bigger deal than marijuana's. Booze also kills
something like 75,000 Americans a year through disease, violence and
accidents, meaning we do not need more of that.

But, it's said, marijuana doesn't hurt anyone. There are arguments all
over the lot on this, but yes, it does, and yes, pot businesses are
going to make a mint in Colorado even as competition drives prices
down and the drug is likely used to an extent never before imagined.

One of the worst possible consequences, if increasing amounts
illegally get in the hands of teenagers, is that their IQ development
will be thwarted and their chances of psychosis immensely aggravated.
One writer says an example of the disorder is believing a TV is
forwarding secret messages.

My message is that other states should watch Colorado carefully for a
number of years before experimenting themselves with the lives of
their children.  
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D