Pubdate: Thu, 15 Aug 2013
Source: Winnipeg Free Press (CN MB)
Copyright: 2013 Winnipeg Free Press
Contact: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/send_a_letter
Website: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/502
Author: Gordon Sinclair Jr.

NO JUSTICE WHEN IT COMES TO ADDICTS

Homeless Aboriginal Gets Jail Time; Doctor Remains Free, Still Practises

The contrast is stark.

And appalling.

A homeless man breaches his probation by being drunk in a public 
place. And is sent back to jail.

A physician pleads guilty to a disturbing list of 14 charges of 
professional misconduct -- including prescribing inappropriate 
medication to vulnerable people and billing for patients he didn't 
treat -- all by way of feeding his drug addiction.

And the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba rules he can 
continue practising. Perhaps, even probably, if police end up 
charging him criminally.

Thus is the privilege of a coddled professional, even a drug-addicted 
one such as Dr. Stephen John Coyle.

And thus is the plight of booze-addicted aboriginal street people, 
even ones such as Faron Hall, whose river rescue just four years ago 
had politicians from city hall to the House of Commons celebrating his bravery.

In a statement that unwittingly contrasted the difference between how 
vulnerable people and the doctor who exploited them are viewed and 
valued, the college rationalized its decision to allow Coyle to keep 
his licence with these class-defining words:

"The public good can be served by allowing a trained and educated 
physician, like Coyle to practise medicine..."

But with what could be viewed as college-ordered probation terms of its own.

Coyle, the former chief medical officer of the Misericordia Health 
Centre, must adhere "to a carefully designed set of the conditions to 
protect the public good."

And how, in Hall's case, is the public good protected by imposing an 
unrealistic probation term such as not being drunk in a public place. 
When public places are his home.

When two years after his original jail sentence he's allowed to drink 
but not get drunk where security officers in the Richardson Building 
can find him and police can take him back into custody.

As for Coyle, it's not that I object to the college's effort to 
provide support for his rehabilitation as a person.

To the contrary. But where's the deterrence for other doctors?

And, even more importantly, where's the hand-holding prescribed 
treatment for jailed addicts such as Hall?

Hall is far from alone in needing the kind of treatment Coyle will 
have access to.

In a recent survey of prisons in Saskatchewan -- whose population 
demographics are similar to Manitoba's -- Statistics Canada found the 
most common need among inmates was addressing substance abuse.

Nine out of 10, or 92 per cent most common.

In other words, our jails and prisons are jammed with people whose 
fundamental crime is the same as Hall's, and for that matter, Coyle's.

But even if Coyle is charged criminally and convicted, there's little 
to no chance he would go jail for a first-time offence.

He probably wouldn't get house arrest if he stayed clean and was back 
to being such a valuable -- and valued -- part of society.

No, for the most part, jail in Manitoba is reserved mostly for 
addicts, aboriginals such as Hall. Many of whom are non-violent.

It's absurd.

As was the sentence that has started the "homeless hero's" 
predictable back-and-forth to jail breaches; an "aggressive 
panhandling" assault. But he kicked a vehicle door, not the woman who 
was struck by it.

A woman who, curiously, happened to be a physician.

That's an example of why in recent years Manitoba has had the dubious 
distinction of having the highest rate of incarceration among the provinces.

A rate more than double the national average.

How would you even sentence someone such as Hall to house arrest?

He doesn't have a home.

So we arrest him and send him back to jail for what all of us are 
allowed to do in our homes.

Drink too much.

There has to be a better, more rational and humane way.

Perhaps even a less expensive way to treat addicts and so many other 
of our incarcerated mentally ill than taking them from the curb to the cell.

Over and over and over again.

Prison and jail cells should be reserved for the truly dangerous; not 
simply those who are most dangerous to themselves.

It's the 21st century, not the 19th century.

Canada needs to check the date.

We as a caring society need to start treating addicts as if they were 
all doctors.

Instead of criminals.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom