Pubdate: Sun, 30 Jun 2013
Source: Republican & Herald (PA)
Copyright: 2013 Associated Press
Contact:  http://republicanherald.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1047
Author: Alicia A. Caldwell and Nancy Benac, Associated Press

MARIJUANA'S MARCH TOWARD MAINSTREAM CONFOUNDS FEDS

WASHINGTON- It took 50 years for American attitudes about marijuana 
to zigzag from the paranoia of "Reefer Madness" to the excesses of 
Woodstock back to the hard line of "Just Say No."

The next 25 years took the nation from Bill Clinton, who famously 
"didn't inhale," to Barack Obama, who most emphatically did.

And now, in just a few short years, public opinion has moved so 
dramatically toward general acceptance that even those who champion 
legalization are surprised at how quickly attitudes are changing and 
states are moving to approve the drug - for medical use and just for fun.

It is a moment in America that is rife with contradictions:

People are looking more kindly on marijuana even as science reveals 
more about the drug's potential dangers, particularly for young people.

States are giving the green light to the drug in direct defiance of a 
federal prohibition on its use.

Exploration of the potential medical benefit is limited by high 
federal hurdles to research.

Washington policymakers seem reluctant to deal with any of it.

Richard Bonnie, a University of Virginia law professor who worked for 
a national commission that recommended decriminalizing marijuana in 
1972, sees the public taking a big leap from prohibition to a more 
laissez-faire approach without full deliberation.

"It's a remarkable story historically," he said. "But as a matter of 
public policy, it's a little worrisome. It's intriguing, it's 
interesting, it's good that liberalization is occurring, but it is a 
little worrisome."

More than a little worrisome to those in the anti-drug movement.

"We're on this hundred-mile-an-hour freight train to legalizing a 
third addictive substance," said Kevin Sabet, a former drug policy 
adviser in the Obama administration, lumping marijuana with tobacco 
and alcohol.

Legalization strategist Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the 
Drug Policy Alliance, likes the direction the marijuana smoke is 
wafting. But he knows his side has considerable work yet to do.

"I'm constantly reminding my allies that marijuana is not going to 
legalize itself," he said.

Eighteen states and the District of Columbia have legalized the use 
of marijuana for medical purposes since California voters made the 
first move in 1996. Voters in Colorado and Washington state took the 
next step last year and approved pot for recreational use. Alaska is 
likely to vote on the same question in 2014, and a few other states 
are expected to put recreational use on the ballot in 2016.

Nearly half of adults have tried marijuana, 12 percent of them in the 
past year, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center. More 
teenagers now say t hey smoke marijuana than ordinary cigarettes.

Fifty-two percent of adults favor legalizing marijuana, up 11 
percentage points just since 2010, according to Pew. Sixty percent 
think Washington shouldn't enforce federal laws against marijuana in 
states that have approved its use. Seventy-two percent think 
government efforts to enforce marijuana laws cost more than they're worth.

"By Election Day 2016, we expect to see at least seven states where 
marijuana is legal and being regulated like alcohol," said Mason 
Tvert, a spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project, a national 
legalization group.

Where California led the charge on medical marijuana, the next 
chapter in this story is being written in Colorado and Washington state.

Policymakers there are struggling with all sorts of sticky issues 
revolving around one central question: How do you legally regulate 
the production, distribution, sale and use of marijuana for 
recreational purposes when federal law bans all of the above?

How do you tax it? What quality control standards do you set? How do 
you protect children while giving grownups the go-ahead to light up? 
What about driving under the influence? Can growers take business tax 
deductions? Who can grow pot, and how much? Where can you use it? Can 
cities opt out? Can workers be fired for smoking marijuana when 
they're off duty? What about taking pot out of state? The list goes on.

The Justice Department began reviewing the matter after last 
November's election and repeatedly has promised to respond soon. But 
seven months later, states still are on their own, left to parse 
every passing comment from the department and President Obama.

In December, Obama said in an interview that "it does not make sense, 
from a prioritization point of view, for us to focus on recreational 
drug users in a state that has already said that under state law that's legal."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom