URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v13/n109/a03.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Sat, 09 Mar 2013
Source: Daily Camera (Boulder, CO)
Copyright: 2013 The Daily Camera.
Contact:
Website: http://www.dailycamera.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/103
Author: Carter S. Johnson
TAKE THE PROFIT MOTIVES OUT OF BOULDER'S MARIJUANA SALES
Boulder City Council's implementation of Amendment 64 needs to only
concern itself with one priority. That priority is: "What was the
intent of the voters in approving the amendment in overwhelming
numbers in the city of Boulder."
What I believe voters stated in voting for Amendment 64 is that they
were tired of the excessive war on drugs, tired of the violence
surrounding drug cartels and tired of the state intruding into their
lives over issues of relatively low governmental concern.
Additionally voters did not express concerns over increasing local
excise taxation, minor access to marijuana nor drug addiction issues
like those currently being touted by stealth opponents to Amendment
64. That tiny voter minority voted against it.
Council needs to address the primary issue of marijuana in our city.
That being Mexican drug cartels currently control the production and
distribution of this plant. Secondarily quasi-legal state implemented
medical marijuana cartels provide limited access to this plant
charging many hundreds of dollars for what is essentially a free
growing weed. To eliminate this status quo City Council must empower
recreational and medical users to become the means of production and
distribution of marijuana, eliminating the cartels and medical
dispensary middlemen.
As a preliminary measure council should concern itself as to how
recreational and medical users of marijuana can easily access this
commodity without undo regulatory overhead. To accomplish this I
suggest making only seed stock available from licensed liquor
merchants already regulated by state and local authorities. Seed
stock requires a commitment from the marijuana consumer to produce
their own commodity and in the process eliminates the profit motive
currently surrounding the sale of the plant. A merchant could sell
say a dozen seeds for 10 bucks with the city collecting $3 from the sale.
Minors will not be getting high from seeds illegally obtained at a
liquor store on Saturday night. Certainly no juveniles are illegally
dosing themselves with beer recently purchased as components from the
local homebrew shop. Those adults wishing for immediate marijuana
gratification can do so by driving to another nearby jurisdiction
that sells it on demand.
So City should step back and reconsider the motives of the voters
again and place their priorities on those concerns -- which is to
take the money out of marijuana first. Then they can immerse
themselves in the minutiae of their over regulatory impulses.
CARTER S. JOHNSON
Boulder
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|