Pubdate: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 Source: Appeal-Democrat (Marysville, CA) Copyright: 2012 Appeal-Democrat Contact: http://www.appeal-democrat.com/sections/services/forms/editorletter.php Website: http://www.appeal-democrat.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1343 Author: Ben van der Meer YUBA COUNTY ENDS MEDICAL POT PANEL; LAWSUITS LOOM Signaling the discussion over medical marijuana is moving from board rooms to court rooms, Yuba County supervisors Tuesday formally suspended an ad hoc committee formed to discuss the issue with growers. Though input from the committee helped improve an ordinance adopted by the county earlier this year, a lawsuit filed by growers last week to get the ordinance tossed makes further meetings inappropriate, said committee member and Supervisor Mary Jane Griego. "We did give it a best effort to try and understand this issue better," she said. Her comments came as the board approved on a 5-0 vote a second reading of amendments to the ordinance, providing clearer language on where growing is allowed. Though representatives for growers attended the meeting, none spoke. Plaintiffs filed a civil complaint asking the ordinance to be thrown out, claiming, among other things, a lack of clarity on collective and cooperative grows could deny some users their prescriptions. The plaintiffs have also said they plan to file for a temporary injunction today in Yuba County Superior Court to prevent the ordinance from being enforced. Supervisors announced they had voted 5-0 during their closed session to refer the suit to outside counsel. Under the ordinance, medical marijuana cardholders are limited in how many plants they can grow by the size of the parcel on which they live, with additional requirements to shield the plants from public view. Supervisors adopted the ordinance after hearing dozens of complaints from residents living next to growers, though many growers said nonusers and the county don't understand the necessity for medical marijuana. Griego, who had previously encouraged the board to take more time in adopting an ordinance to make it more comprehensive, said Tuesday she still believes the ordinance is a work in progress. "This ordinance is going to adjust, whether with our actions or court actions," she said. The county might want to consider changes in the fall, after growers have completed their annual harvest, she said. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom