URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v12/n267/a01.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 1
Pubdate: Tue, 08 May 2012
Source: Daytona Beach News-Journal (FL)
Copyright: 2012 News-Journal Corporation
Contact:
Website: http://www.news-journalonline.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/700
Note: gives priority to local writers
Author: David T. Nalley
TESTS KEEP PEOPLE SAFE
In response to the federal judge in Miami striking down the random
drug testing for state employees, I am baffled. Are there no
safeguards to protect the public from impaired public employees?
I have worked for a private company here in DeLand for 16 years and
have been randomly tested nine times. With over 2,000 vehicles
nationwide, it has been a longstanding policy to ensure that the
public is protected from impaired driver-employees. The work
environment includes motorized equipment, and fellow workers do not
feel at risk by others being impaired. A safe work environment
protects the employee and the public in general by helping ensure, to
the best of one's ability, that sober and straight employees are
interacting with the public in the workplace, and in company vehicles
in a responsible manner.
State employees drive thousands of vehicles, ranging from compact
cars to tractor trailers, and numerous heavy equipment pieces with no
ability to monitor their safe operations of the above. It's a double
standard if state employees have exclusive protection under the
Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Personally, I do not find
it intrusive. I take comfort that fellow employees are sober and
straight and do not fear an unsafe work environment.
DAVID T. NALLEY, DeLand
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|