URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v12/n199/a02.html
Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Thu, 29 Mar 2012
Source: San Francisco Examiner (CA)
Copyright: 2012 SF Newspaper Company LLC
Contact:
Website: http://www.sfexaminer.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/389
Author: Stephen Buel
SF DISTRICT ATTORNEY GEORGE GASCON SAYS HE SUPPORTS MEDICAL MARIJUANA
San Francisco District Attorney George Gascon disagrees with a legal
brief in which his office argued that marijuana sales are illegal,
and he said Wednesday that prosecuting marijuana cases will not be a
priority for his administration.
The brief, filed this month in the case of a woman arrested on
suspicion of possessing and attempting to sell cannabis products,
argued that any sale of marijuana is illegal under state law.
But Wednesday, following publication of a story in The San Francisco
Examiner, Gascon said the argument was made without his knowledge or
approval. And he pledged that his office will no longer advance that position.
"I support medical marijuana and I have said that very many times,"
Gascon said. "This particular brief was crafted three years ago and
has been used from time to time by our attorneys. ... I have already
taken steps to take that memo out of circulation."
Although the legality of medical marijuana is far from clear under
federal law, operators of The City's numerous dispensaries generally
view state and local as protective of their right to operate.
Gascon said his office recently met with the attorney for the
arrested woman, former District Attorney Terence Hallinan, and agreed
to a two-week continuance for the purpose of reassessing the
appropriate next step.
Prosecutors and Hallinan disagree about the facts of the case, but
Gascon said if the woman truly was working on behalf of a registered
dispensary and selling marijuana to licensed patients, the charges
against her would probably be dismissed.
The district attorney said he disagreed with some of the legal
arguments made in the now-disavowed legal brief, which he said failed
to take into account how medical marijuana law has evolved locally.
"Dealing with marijuana is not a priority for this office," he vowed.
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom
|