Pubdate: Sun, 25 Dec 2011
Source: Bay City Times, The (MI)
Copyright: 2011 The Bay City Times
Contact: http://www.mlive.com/mailforms/bctimes/letters/index.ssf/
Website: http://www.mlive.com/bay-city/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1453
Author: Robert Sharpe
Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11/n720/a02.html

DRUG ABUSE IS BAD, BUT THE DRUG WAR IS WORSE

Regarding your Dec. 18 editorial, the work of the Bay Area Drug 
Enforcement Team is no doubt well-intended, but ultimately 
counterproductive. Attempts to limit the supply of illegal drugs 
while demand remains constant only increase the profitability of drug 
trafficking. For addictive drugs like heroin, a spike in street 
prices leads desperate addicts to increase criminal activity to feed 
desperate habits. The drug war doesn't fight crime, it fuels crime.

With alcohol prohibition repealed, liquor bootleggers no longer gun 
each other down in drive-by shootings, nor do consumers go blind 
drinking unregulated bathtub gin. While U.S. politicians ignore the 
drug war's historical precedent, European countries are embracing 
harm reduction, a public health alternative based on the principle 
that both drug abuse and prohibition have the potential to cause harm.

Examples of harm reduction include needle exchange programs to stop 
the spread of HIV, marijuana regulation aimed at separating the hard 
and soft drug markets, and treatment alternatives that do not require 
incarceration as a prerequisite. Unfortunately, fear of appearing 
"soft on crime" compels many U.S. politicians to support a failed 
drug war that ultimately subsidizes organized crime. Drug abuse is 
bad, but the drug war is worse.

Robert Sharpe, policy analyst, Common Sense for Drug Policy, Arlington, Va.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom