Pubdate: Tue, 05 Apr 2011
Source: Ravalli Republic (Hamilton, MT)
Copyright: 2011 Ravalli Republic
Contact:  http://www.ravallirepublic.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3254
Author: Charles S. Johnson, Ravalli Republic State Bureau

NEW AMENDMENTS EMERGE FOR REGULATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA

HELENA - A bipartisan group in the House has proposed some major
changes that seek to restore Montana's medical marijuana law to what
people thought they were voting on in 2004.

Rep. Cary Smith, R-Billings, said the amendments will be offered
Wednesday at a 3 p.m. hearing before the House Human Services
Committee on Senate Bill 423, by Sen. Jeff Essmann, R-Billings.

SB423 appears to be the lone-surviving bill to repeal the current law
and put into place a strict regulatory and licensing system.

Meanwhile, HB161, by House Speaker Mike Milburn, R-Cascade, would
repeal the law altogether as of July 1. Milburn's bill has passed both
chambers and is headed to Gov. Brian Schweitzer, who has said he wants
the law fixed, not repealed.

Besides Smith, others who worked on the amendments Tuesday afternoon
were House Majority Leader Tom McGillvray, R-Billings; and Reps. Tom
Berry, R-Roundup; Gary MacLaren, R-Victor; and Diane Sands,
D-Missoula. Most have been working on medical marijuana bills
throughout the session, while Sands was chairwoman and MacLaren vice
chairman of an interim committee that studied the issue last year.

They took parts of various bills that they agreed on and are combining
them for what amounts to a rewrite of SB423.

"We looked at what we liked in other bills," Smith
said.

Some earlier sets of amendments drafted for SB423 may not be offered
at the meeting in favor of the bipartisan group's proposals. Earlier,
Smith and Rep. Pat Noonan, D-Ramsay, each had a set of amendments
prepared for the bill.

Here are some the highlights of the bipartisan proposal, according to Smith:

   The current medical marijuana law would be repealed mid-year, as
Essmann's bill does.

   It would be up to a physician to determine what debilitating
conditions leads to a recommendation that a patient use medical
marijuana. The physician would have to certify that the patient's
condition is debilitating, why it is and describe the other
medications, procedures and other medical options that had been tried
previously to treat the patient but weren't effective.

   The state Department of Public Health and Human Services would
register all medical marijuana patients and issue them cards. Those
who provide marijuana to patients also would have to register with the
department. No other state agency would be involved. Local law
enforcement agencies would be notified about which people in their
cities or counties are legally using and growing medical marijuana.

   Montana no longer would have any licensed medical marijuana growing
operations or storefront dispensaries for the product.

   Instead, one provider could grow medical marijuana for one
authorized patient, but couldn't profit from it. A provider could grow
marijuana for a patient, but that patient couldn't grow for a
provider. Someone could grow marijuana for up to three people, but
only if they are related by blood or marriage, again without profiting
from it.

   Like other proposals, these amendments would forbid telemedicine as
a means for physicians to see patients regarding medical marijuana.

   If the amendments are approved and the bill passed, HB175 would be
nullified. This bill, by Rep. Keith Regier, R-Kalispell, calls for a
voters to decide by a referendum in November 2012 whether to repeal
whatever medical marijuana law is on the books at the time or to keep
it.

Smith said the biggest problem with Essmann's SB423 is that it called
for state-licensed medical marijuana growers. That would have required
state regulation.

"We wanted to take it back to what Montanans thought they voted for,"
he said.

He cited language from the 2004 voter information pamphlet in which
backers of the initiative said, "Perhaps most importantly, I-148 would
allow patients to grow their own personal supply of marijuana so that
they will no longer have to buy marijuana from the criminal market."

"It doesn't talk about having businesses and grow operations," Smith
said.

Smith has been a strong advocate of repeal, but said these amendments
would lead to a bill that amounts "the next best thing."

Essmann had said his goal under SB423 was to see medical marijuana
cardholders drop to less than 2,000 from the current 28,500.

Smith said he wasn't sure how many fewer cardholders there would be if
the bill with these amendments passed.

"It's going to be considerably less," he said. "We know it's not going
to be the 28,000, 29,000 we have now." 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard R Smith Jr.