Pubdate: Fri, 29 Oct 2010
Source: Los Angeles Daily News (CA)
Copyright: 2010 Los Angeles Newspaper Group
Contact: http://www.dailynews.com/writealetter
Website: http://www.dailynews.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/246
Author: Hector De La Torre
Note: Assemblyman Hector De La Torre represents the 50th district in 
the California State Assembly.
Cited: Proposition 19 http://yeson19.com/
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/find?272 (Proposition 19)

WHY YOU SHOULD VOTE YES ON PROP. 19

AS an elected official, I believe California's current marijuana 
policy is a failure that causes immense harm to our communities. That 
is why I am endorsing Proposition 19, the initiative to control, tax 
and regulate adult cannabis consumption.

I do not use marijuana, nor do I want anyone's children to use it. 
However, the reality is that our current marijuana prohibition laws 
do nothing to prevent use, especially among young people. Teens 
consistently report that it is easier for them to obtain illegal 
marijuana than it is to get legal and age-regulated alcohol. That's 
because schoolyard dealers don't ask for ID like licensed businesses do.

It is time to create a sensible, constructive policy that takes 
marijuana out of the hands of organized crime and actually allows our 
local governments to begin enacting control and regulation.

Every year, our state spends hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars 
and thousands of police hours on the war against marijuana. Every 
police hour spent targeting nonviolent adult marijuana offenders is 
an hour that could be spent protecting our communities from the 
threat of violent crime. Indeed, in 2008 almost 60,000 violent crimes 
went unsolved in California. That same year, more than 61,000 
Californians were arrested for misdemeanor marijuana possession.

We just cannot afford to distract our law enforcement officials with 
low-level marijuana offenses.

At the same time, other state legislators and I are trying to find 
solutions to our state's ongoing multi-billion dollar budget deficit. 
Last year's shortfall equals the amount spent last year on prisons, 
community colleges and the California State University and University 
of California systems combined, according to the nonpartisan 
California Budget Project.

In a study released this month, Jeffrey Miron, a Harvard University 
economist, found that marijuana prohibition in California alone 
consumes overall government expenditures of more than $960 million 
annually while forcing us to forgo what would be an additional $351 
million in tax revenues from legal and taxed marijuana.

As elected officials, we must overcome decades-old complacency and 
legislative gridlock surrounding this issue. When current policy has 
so obviously failed, we must begin the hard work of crafting better 
policy solutions and learning to adapt to changing circumstances.

I believe the passage of Proposition 19 would yield many positive 
results. We can take advantage of the projected increase in tax 
revenues to avoid budget cuts to education and other public services. 
We can support the development of small businesses. And we can 
establish responsible labor standards that support employer and 
employee success in a legal, regulated market.

And importantly, Proposition 19 will establish a strongly regulated 
market for marijuana just like we have for alcohol. Only licensed 
vendors will be permitted to sell marijuana, and then only to adults 
older than 21. The cost savings from no longer prosecuting low-level 
marijuana users and the new revenue generated by taxing and 
regulating it will be especially important in these tough economic times.

Proposition 19 would also curtail the destruction in our forests and 
wilderness areas by illegal growers who supply drug cartels and gangs.

The people of California recognize that regulation and taxation are 
preferable to the current broken system of marijuana prohibition.

A poll released this week by Survey USA shows 48 percent of those 
polled support taxing and regulating marijuana, compared with 44 
percent against. Constituencies with majority support include likely 
voters ages 18 to 34 (59 percent), independents (51 percent) and 
Latino voters (50 percent).

For these reasons I will be voting yes on Proposition 19. I urge 
others to do the same.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake