Pubdate: Tue, 12 Oct 2010
Source: Press and Guide (Dearborn, MI)
Copyright: 2010 Press and Guide
Contact:  http://www.pressandguide.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/5196
Author: Ben Baird, Press & Guide Newspapers

HEIGHTS COUNCIL DEBATING STATUS OF MEDICAL POT DISPENSARIES, MANUFACTURING

DEARBORN HEIGHTS --Whether medical marijuana dispensaries and 
manufacturing facilities should be allowed into the city, or whether 
ordinance, should be like Livonia's and not allow them was one 
decision City Council discussed Tuesday.

Currently, the city has a moratorium on medical marijuana that has 
been extended for four months. It was created to give council time to 
adopt ordinance dealing with the changes in state law.

Attorney Mark Roberts said the ordinance presently before council was 
created to regulate according to state law.

The ordinance went past its first reading before City Council on Sept. 14.

Roberts said the ordinance would allow manufacturing facilities and 
dispensaries, businesses where legally registered primary caregivers 
can assist qualifying patients with medical marijuana use.

Dispensaries would be allowed in commercial zoning, he said, while 
manufacturing facilities could only be in industrial zoning.

Included in the ordinance are more specific guidelines that would 
prevent these facilities from being within 500 feet of any school, 
childcare center, public park or place of worship.

Councilman Roy Pilot said among the different approaches communities 
are taking with medical marijuana is outright denial to these 
facilities, which is what Livonia is doing. Council has been advised 
the city would be sued if it took this path, he said.

Corporation Counsel Gary Miotke said his understanding of Livonia's 
ordinance, which goes according to federal law, is that nobody can 
grow or possess marijuana.

If Dearborn Heights did this it would be a big liability, he said, 
because it would be counter to state law. He said the city's 
authority is dictated by state law.

Roberts said he disagreed on what Livonia's method allows. He said 
residents there can still own and use marijuana if they are licensed 
to by the state, because these activities are not land uses. 
Livonia's ordinance only deals with land use, he said, which prevents 
caregiver and growing facilities.

Miotke said he deferred to Roberts on this because Roberts was more 
familiar with Livonia's ordinance.

The city has a great deal of control over local land use, Roberts 
said. He said he believes an ordinance that doesn't allow these 
facilities would be defensible, although like anything still open to challenge.

Councilwoman Elizabeth Agius said she won't be satisfied to approve 
ordinance until state legislature does a better job at crafting the 
law's language.

Currently the city will be too vulnerable to criticism and lawsuits 
no matter what it does, she said.

"I'm just not comfortable with this," Agius said.

Every Michigan community is taking their own approach, she said. She 
said with so many options it's too difficult to research the best solution.

Miotke said he doesn't advise a wait and see approach.

A moratorium can't be extended forever, he said, and then there won't 
be an ordinance limiting where these facilities can be.

Councilwoman Janet Badalow said there are already situations 
appearing in the city that require the ordinance.

"Waiting is going to create more problems for us in the future," Badalow said.

She said council revisits ordinances all the time, and could make 
changes to this one later.

Councilman Tom Berry said he thinks council is in agreement that it's 
uncomfortable with the vague law. Until the state rehashes it the 
city needs to have something in place for the local level so there 
are regulations in place to protect the community, he said.

Roberts said the state law is pretty clear. Marijuana is still 
illegal in Michigan, he said, but the law allows specific exceptions 
for medicinal purposes.

"All other uses are still illegal," Roberts said.

Heidi Parikh, president of the Downriver Community Compassion Club, 
said she was discouraged to hear a lot about what the city should do 
to keep itself out of trouble, but not how patients in the city could 
be helped by medical marijuana.

One idea she has is for residents who are patients to have a communal 
garden where they can grow their marijuana, she said. She said taking 
care of the garden would be therapeutic in itself.

Parikh said she encourages council to take its time with the ordinance.

A mental health professional said he recommended that council make 
the ordinance a compromise between those for and against medical 
marijuana, otherwise the city will be sued for whichever way the 
ordinance leans.

He said he wasn't there to discuss the positive or negatives of 
medical marijuana, but to provide a neutral perspective.

Richard Coogan, Planning Commission chairman, said if the city does 
nothing or goes according to federal law then it will be challenged 
in court, and the boundaries of what is allowed will be pushed.

"Let's really study this and work at this," he said.

Council needs to find a solution that works for Dearborn Heights and 
only Dearborn Heights, he said.

Mary Klein, a resident of the 5100 block of Westpoint and an 
accredited addiction counselor, said everyone she's talked to in her 
neighborhood wants the city to do the same as Livonia. She feels she 
represents her neighborhood accurately, she said.

"The people who voted for you do not want this," she said.

Her neighborhood in the south end already has enough problems, Klein said.

Some other concerns raised during the study session were the 
appropriate number of caregivers per dispensary and the difficulty 
for police to monitor these facilities for security purposes.

McKenna Associates were directed to analyze which locations the 
dispensaries and manufacturing facilities could be located at.

Councilwoman Janet Badalow requested another study session to discuss 
the ordinance and review this map of possible locations.

Baron said the next study session on this could possibly be Oct. 19. 
He said there's quite a diversity of opinion between council members 
on the ordinance, and he wouldn't be surprised if there are multiple 
other sessions to discuss this.

Council has until January before the moratorium ends, Baron said, but 
he believes they'll approve something before then. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake