Pubdate: Thu, 12 Aug 2010
Source: Edmonton Journal (CN AB)
Page: A16
Copyright: 2010 The Edmonton Journal
Contact: http://www2.canada.com/edmontonjournal/letters.html
Website: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/134
Author: Andres Oppenheimer
Note: Andres Oppenheimer is a Latin America correspondent for the Miami Herald.
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

MEXICAN PRESIDENT MISGUIDED WITH BLANKET LEGALIZATION OF DRUGS

Catch-All Approach Has Only Boosted Corruption in Other Countries

Legalization of drugs - long an issue championed mainly by fringe 
groups - is rapidly moving to the mainstream in Latin America.

Last week's surprise statement by former Mexican President Vicente 
Fox in support of "legalizing production, sales and distribution" of 
drugs made big headlines around the world.

Fox, a former close U.S. ally who belongs to the same centre-right 
political party as President Felipe Calderon, rocked the boat at home 
by indirectly criticizing the very premise of Calderon's all-out 
military offensive against Mexico's drug cartels, which has cost 
28,000 lives since 2006.

Calderon immediately responded that he opposes legalization of drugs, 
although he has opened a dialogue with political parties about the 
future of his country's anti-drug policies.

The left-of-centre Party of the Democratic Revolution announced that 
it supports "de facto legalization" of drugs.

Fox's statement, first published on Saturday in his blog, went far 
beyond a 2009 joint declaration by former presidents Fernando 
Henrique Cardoso of Brazil, Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico and Cesar 
Gaviria of Colombia.

In that statement, the three former leaders questioned the 
effectiveness of the U.S. war on drugs and proposed decriminalizing 
possession of marijuana for personal use.

While the three centrist former presidents' proposal amounted to not 
prosecuting people for consuming marijuana, Fox's proposal calls for 
legalization of all major drugs - the whole enchilada.

In an extended interview, Fox told me that he is making his proposal 
because drug-related violence in Mexico has reached intolerable 
levels and because the experience of other countries such as the 
Netherlands has shown that allowing drug sales has not significantly 
driven up drug consumption.

"Prohibitionist policies have hardly worked anywhere," Fox told me. 
"Prohibition of alcohol in the United States (in the 1920s) never 
worked, and it only helped trigger violence and crime."

Since possession of small amounts of marijuana has already been 
decriminalized in Mexico, what is needed now are bolder steps, such 
as legalizing drug production and using the taxes it generates to 
fund anti-drug education programs, he said.

"What I'm proposing is that, instead of allowing this business to 
continue being run by criminals, by cartels, that it be run by 
law-abiding business people who are registered with the Ministry of 
Finance, pay taxes and create jobs," Fox said. Fox called for a 
reversal of Calderon's decision to send the army into the streets to 
fight the drug cartels because "the army is not prepared to do police 
work, and we are seeing day to day how the army's image is losing 
ground in Mexico" as a result of this war.

"Why didn't you come out with this proposal when you were president?" 
I asked. Fox responded that legalization was often discussed in 
cabinet meetings during his presidency, but that the urgency of such 
a measure has increased since "because of the extraordinary cost we 
are paying in a drop in tourism, a drop in investments and a lack of 
attention to education and health."

In a separate interview, White House drug czar R. Gil Kerlikowske 
told me that drug legalization is a "non-starter" in the Obama administration.

Kerlikowske disputed the idea that alcohol prohibition drove up crime 
in the United States in the 1920s, arguing that there were no 
reliable crime statistics at the time.

And he rejected the notion that there has been no major increase in 
drug consumption in the Netherlands.

"In the Netherlands, consumption did go up. In fact, the Netherlands 
has been in the process of closing down hundreds of the marijuana 
cafes that had been in existence because of the problems that are 
occurring," he said.

My opinion: I'm not convinced that a blanket legalization of drugs 
would work because government regulation of the cocaine and heroin 
businesses in countries that already have high corruption rates would 
result in greater official corruption.

On the other hand, it's clear that after four years of Calderon's 
U.S.backed war on drugs, the cartels are smuggling more drugs, 
killing more people and becoming richer.

Perhaps the time has come to take a step-by-step approach and start a 
serious debate about passing laws that would regulate legal 
production of marijuana, alongside massive education campaigns to 
discourage people from using it.

Then, we could see who is right and consider what to do next.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom