Pubdate: Thu, 15 Apr 2010
Source: City on a Hill Press (UC Santa Cruz, CA, Edu)
Copyright: 2010 City on a Hill Press
Contact:  http://www.cityonahillpress.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4753
Author: Blair Stenvick
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/topic/Dispensaries

MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES' PROFITS APPEAR HAZY

The Santa Cruz City Council is working for more transparency in the 
financial records of the two medical marijuana dispensaries in Santa 
Cruz. The dispensaries in question are Greenway Compassionate Relief 
and the Santa Cruz Patient Collective.

According to Council Member Don Lane, "We want to make sure that we 
have access for those who need it, see that it is affordable for 
those who need it, and make sure that the dispensaries are in 
compliance with the current rules."

These current rules focus less on the product of marijuana, and more 
on the business side of dispensaries.

For instance, California Senate Bill 420, which passed in 2004, does 
not explicitly "authorize any individual or group to cultivate or 
distribute marijuana for profit." This means that dispensaries must 
be nonprofits, which center on providing a service, not making the 
owners wealthy. As Lane said, "Nonprofits in general are not owned by 
individuals -- they're owned by a community."

On April 27, the City Council will officially decide on the 
procedures they will use to verify the two dispensaries' statuses as 
nonprofits. Meanwhile, "[The procedures are] still being ironed out 
by a small subcommittee of city council members," said Council Member 
Tony Madrigal.

There needs to be some accountability," said Captain Steve Clark of 
the Santa Cruz Police Department. "They need to be operating within 
the parameters that the state set up."

Madrigal observed that "the dispensaries have been very cooperative 
so far." However, Lane said he does have some concerns.

There seems to be a little reluctance with [providing] the financial 
information," he said.

A reason for that reluctance likely has to do with confidentiality.

I think their main concern is ensuring the privacy of their 
patients," Madrigal said.

Clark says he has his own doubts about the integrity of medical 
marijuana dispensaries.

It was surprising when one of the collectives wanted a ten thousand 
square foot indoor growing operation ... that causes us to question 
how much is really necessary to serve the legitimate medical needs in 
the community," Clark said. "If there's really that much of a need 
for medical marijuana then they've been underreporting their sales."

However, Clark expressed more concern over the mistreatment of 
medical marijuana by individuals than by dispensaries.

A good deal of marijuana trafficking occurs under the guise of 
medical marijuana," he said. "I'm not saying that's because of the 
dispensaries."

All concerns regarding medical marijuana could change if an 
initiative to make cannabis legal and taxable in California passes in November.

I suspect that [legalizing cannabis] would really have an impact ... 
because it would change the access to marijuana," Lane said. "[But] 
it's too soon to know for sure."

Regardless of whether individuals or dispensaries deserve more of the 
blame, Clark says he is tired of the police being caught in the 
middle of what he feels is a social issue.

Somebody on a legislative level needs to have the courage to step up 
on this. Either it's legal or it's not."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom