Pubdate: Sat, 13 Feb 2010
Source: Record Searchlight ( Redding, CA )
Copyright: 2010 Record Searchlight
Contact:  http://www.redding.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/360
Author: David Benda

LOCAL GOVERNMENT WRESTLES WITH LEGAL MARIJUANA

Carla Thompson, Shasta Lake's top planner, recalled that she felt a sense 
of urgency last summer when interest in opening medical marijuana 
dispensaries started growing in her city.

The nonprofit clinics had already taken root in neighboring Redding.  "We 
knew how many collectives were in the city of Redding at the time, and we 
had some concern we might see that same thing happen here," said Thompson, 
Shasta Lake's development services director.

Planners across the state have struggled with the same issues, scrambling 
to come up with rules to regulate this green business since the Obama 
administration last year vowed to stop frequent raids of medical marijuana 
dispensaries.  That declaration opened the door for cannabis collectives in 
the north state and across California.  But as cities and counties either 
voted to ban dispensaries or place moratoriums on them, nearby cities and 
counties saw collectives seeking to open in their borders.  That led to 
more moratoriums as city councils and boards of supervisors strove to put 
the brakes on the growth and come up with regulations limiting where and 
how many dispensaries could exist.

Nearly 200 California cities have either banned pot collectives or have 
enforced moratoriums, according to Americans for Safe Access.  The medical 
cannabis advocacy group reports on its Web site that 31 cities in 
California have specific ordinances for medical marijuana cooperatives.

"We shouldn't be living in an environment where one city can ban the 
activity and force other cities to deal with the repercussions," Americans 
for Safe Access spokesman Kris Hermes said.

Regional Impact

The city of Mount Shasta was one of those cities forced to deal with such 
repercussions.  This month, it extended a pot clinic moratorium it first 
imposed in December for another 10 months.

Mount Shasta Mayor Michael Murray said his city was initially persuaded by 
recent actions of surrounding communities, whose temporary moratoriums had 
spiked interest in opening cannabis clinics in Mount Shasta.

"Mount Shasta didn't do anything when our first two opened ( in ) August, 
but then Dunsmuir, Weed and Yreka all put on moratoriums and our permits 
doubled with more asking questions," Murray said.

So Murray's city quickly approved the extended moratorium to give it time 
to arrive at permanent rules for marijuana dispensaries.

Shasta Lake Takes Action

With an eye on Redding's proliferation of dispensaries - estimated at 20 to 
40 - Shasta Lake imposed a 45-day moratorium in early September on the 
dispensaries in its town before finally enacting a permanent ordinance last 
month.  The emergency moratorium came after two such operations - one that 
opened its doors a day before the City Council approved the ban - were 
approved at the staff level.

"Something like this ( medical marijuana clinics ) has the potential for 
regional impacts," Thompson said.

Officials in Shasta Lake in early January adopted a permanent ordinance 
that basically says marijuana collectives are allowed only on Shasta Dam 
Boulevard - from Cascade Boulevard west to the railroad overcrossing.

Permits Needed

With two marijuana collectives, Shasta Lake is overshadowed by Redding, 
where before the city adopted its new ordinance, there was an estimated 20 
to 40 pot clinics doing business.

Under Redding's new law, the collectives must have a permit to 
operate.  Police Chief Peter Hansen said the city has received 20 
applications to operate medical marijuana collectives in Redding.

"I think planning is done best when you have a coordinated approach," said 
Pete Parkinson, the American Planning Association California Chapter's vice 
president for policy and legislation.  "We are much better off when we have 
a regional approach to planning and similar rules apply from jurisdiction 
to jurisdiction."

In an unusual step, planners around the north state got together last fall 
to discuss the impact of medical marijuana dispensaries.

"We shared our approaches and how we were going to move forward," Thompson 
said.

Shasta County Resource Management Director Russ Mull said it's not a fluke 
that pot clinics first started proliferating in Redding - it's where most 
of the people live in the north state.

Shasta County on Tuesday voted to continue talking about a proposed medical 
marijuana ordinance.  The new ordinance, which will be discussed again on 
Feb.  23, would include zoning and permit requirements, as well as 
restrictions on how much and where marijuana can be grown.

The county's ordinance was developed after supervisors turned down a 45-day 
moratorium on cannabis collectives in November.

So while Shasta County continues to haggle over a specific ordinance, there 
are no rules regulating medical marijuana collectives in the unincorporated 
areas.

A Pressing Issue

Mull noted that cannabis collectives are topic A for planners across the state.

"If you read the e-mails from our various professionals, whether it's the 
environmental ( impact ), the health or planning, it's just a chatterbox 
back and forth," Mull said.

And planners are paying attention, watching what neighboring communities 
are doing as they come up with rules for their own cities and counties.

"Our proposals are frankly a compilation of a half-dozen jurisdictions," 
Mull said.

In December, the city of Redding decided to allow cannabis clubs, but 
imposed tight restrictions on them to ensure they operate as nonprofits 
under Proposition 215.  The new rules went into effect in January.

In Tehama County, Red Bluff initially proposed a ban to outlaw 
dispensaries, then took it back and imposed a moratorium after public outcry.

The Tehama County Board of Supervisors is studying potential elements of a 
permanent medical marijuana ordinance while a temporary ban remains in place.

Planners are also looking to the courts, an example of the thorny legal 
issues surrounding pot clubs that will affect decisions.

"The result of the litigation tells us how the legal world will look at 
whatever proposal the city or county has taken," Tehama County Planning 
Director George Robson said.

Ultimately, the city of Redding turned to its legal department to finalize 
regulations for cannabis collectives operating within the city.

"Once it was determined the basic issues here were not so much planning 
related but more related to permitting as they do for card games, card 
houses, those are typically taken care of by the city attorney's office or 
others," Redding senior planner Kent Manuel said.

Moreover, so much about medical marijuana collectives is in flux and 
working its way through the courts, Manuel said.

"There are certainly some sensitive cases working through the ( state ) 
Supreme Court, and the attorney's office is obviously better up to speed 
than perhaps planning staff," Manuel said.

Mayor Murray in Mount Shasta said it's not his place to interpret law.

"That will all get defined more clearly over time in the state Legislature 
and court system," Murray said.  "But we do control zoning, permitting and 
other municipal regulations." 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D