Pubdate: Thu, 09 Dec 2010
Source: Globe-Gazette (Mason City, IA)
Copyright: 2010 Globe-Gazette
Contact: http://www.globegazette.com/app/opinion/submit_letter_to_the_editor/
Website: http://www.globegazette.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1568
Author: Donald Kaul
Note: OtherWords columnist Donald Kaul lives in Ann Arbor, Mich.

END THE POT PROHIBITION

I have a confession to make. I hope it won't make you think ill of 
me. I have never smoked marijuana, not even a puff. Not ever.

Not that I didn't have my chances. Back in 1970 I was covering the 
Wadena Rock Festival in Iowa (sort of Woodstock lite) when a young 
woman came up to me and said: "Want me to turn you on?" I'm pretty 
sure she was talking about pot. I respectfully declined.

Yes, I know, it was weak of me. The best and the brightest of my 
generation were courageously yielding to temptation while I, coward 
that I was, retreated from it.

Part of it, I suppose, was the fear of getting caught. When that girl 
made her proposal to me, a headline flashed through my mind: 
"Semi-famous Columnist Busted While Smoking Dope with Teeny Bopper."

It would not have done my career any good, to say nothing of my marriage.

I'm a risk-reward kind of guy. "If you can't do the time, don't do 
the crime." That's my motto.

Taking a chance, however slim, of ruining your life in exchange for 
an opportunity to inhale a substance that makes you giggle is not a good trade.

Besides I have enough trouble dealing with drugs that have ice cubes 
in them. I don't need one that doesn't punish you the next morning.

So it was thanks but no thanks      for me. Still is.

I wouldn't bring up any of this except for Prop 19. That was the 
ballot initiative in California that would have effectively legalized 
the cultivation and sale of marijuana in the state. It was defeated, 
but supporters say the proposed law was badly worded and they'll try 
again next time. In any case, the issue isn't going away any time soon.

The case for legalization is fairly strong. Each year we spend some 
$10 billion enforcing our marijuana laws and arrest 750,000 people 
for possession of small amounts of the drug.

Many of these people go to jail at considerable expense to the state 
and their reputations. A classic lose-lose situation.

Despite that, the National Institute on Drug Abuse has found that the 
drug has remained "almost universally available to American 12th graders."

In other words, if we really are waging a war on drugs, we're losing.

There's even some question over how effective the laws are in preventing usage.

According to Evan Wood, writing in the Los Angeles Times, "In the 
Netherlands, where marijuana has been sold in licensed 'coffee shops' 
since the 1970s, about 20 percent of the adult population has used 
the drug at some time ... In the United States ... 42 percent of the 
adult population has used marijuana."

Maybe that's true, maybe not. What's inarguable is that the marijuana 
trade, much like the illegal liquor business during Prohibition, has 
spawned a network of violent gangs who control it. Legalization would 
put them out of business. Maybe.

That said, the case against legalizing marijuana is also a strong one.

Smoking pot isn't healthy.

It's smoking, for one thing. We know what that does to your lungs.

And really, do we need yet another avenue of escape from reality? Our 
children spend an inordinate amount of time in front of the 
television set or on the Internet or playing video games.

So now you want to make it easier for them to retreat even deeper 
into disengagement?

I don't think so. What I'd like to see is for society to 
decriminalize marijuana without legalizing it. Make it like a 
speeding ticket. Fine people for using it but don't destroy their lives.

That's a hypocritical solution I suppose, but I hide behind the words 
of the great French philosopher, Francois de La Rochefoucauld:

"Hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue."

You'd be surprised how often that comes in handy.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom