Pubdate: Wed, 1 Dec 2010
Source: AlterNet (US Web)
Copyright: 2010 Independent Media Institute
Website: http://www.alternet.org/
Author: Tony Newman
Note: Tony Newman is communications director for the Drug Policy Alliance.

AP's Excellent Drug War Coverage

Cartel Arrests Don't Stop the Drug Trade -- But They Do Increase Violence

The AP Is Doing Crack Reporting in Its 'Impact Series' On the Drug 
War; the Latest Report Questions How Effective Drug Busts on Cartels 
Really Are.

The Associated Press deserves a Pulitzer Prize for its "Impact Series"
on the Drug War!

Back in May, AP dropped a bombshell on America's longest war and the
headline said it all: "The US Drug War has Met None of its Goals." The
extensive piece reviewed the last 40 years, starting with President
Nixon's official launch of the War on Drugs all the way to President
Obama's annual strategy released this year. The piece packed a punch
from the start: "After 40 years, the United States' War on Drugs has
cost $1 trillion dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives, and for
what? Drug use is rampant and violence more brutal and
widespread."

Today the AP Impact Series again broke ground with its piece, "Cartel
Arrests Did Not Curb Drug Trade." The bottom line is that despite all
of the DEA and Justice Department press conferences, photo-ops of
people in handcuffs, and tons of drugs seized, the cartels are
stronger than ever.

The piece starts by reminding us of Attorney General Holder's first
press conference in 2009 when he announced the largest-ever federal
crackdown on Mexico's Sinaloa drug cartel, in which 761 people were
arrested and 23 tons of drugs were seized. Standing by him was acting
DEA Chief Michele Leonhart who said, "Today we have dealt the Sinaloa
drug cartel a crushing blow."

Instead of just reporting the story and waiting for the next press
conference announcing "major blows" to cartels, the AP actually
figured out and documented how "crushing" this crackdown really was to
the cartel.

The AP tracked almost 200 of the people arrested, analyzed thousands
of pages of court records, and interviewed dozens of prisoners, law
enforcement agents and criminal law experts. Among the findings:

.  Federal agents have not nabbed top cartel bosses. None of the bosses
who control their syndicates have ever been arrested in the U.S.

.  Many of the people they do arrest are not even middle management.
They are low-level American street dealers and "mules" who help
smuggle the drugs. Such workers are easily replaced with only a minor
inconvenience to the organization.

.  A third of those arrested are already out on the streets. Jurors
acquitted them, or prosecutors decided there was not enough evidence
to hold them. Others jumped bail or went undercover for the DEA.

The AP points out that their story confirms what critics of drug war
have said for years: The government is quick to boast about large
arrests and seizures, but its efforts result in little, in any,
slowdown in the drug trade.

And not only has it failed to interrupt the drug trade - it has made
it much more violent. While Mexico's and the United States' "surge" in
fighting the cartels over the last four years has not impacted drug
availability or slowed down the trade, it has led to close to 30,000
prohibition related deaths in Mexico. It's not the marijuana or coca
plants themselves or the use of these drugs that causes this
bloodbath. The brutality is a byproduct of drug prohibition, which
makes drugs as valuable as gold and creates a profit motive that
people are willing to kill for.

The U.S. has given Mexico $1.3 billion in aid to buy guns and tanks.
What Mexico really needs doesn't cost a penny. It needs the U.S. to
open up a true debate about the causes and solutions to the violence
in Mexico.

It is time for an exit strategy from this failed War on Drugs. And
it's up to us - as people who care about science, compassion, health,
and human rights - to make sure that the time comes as soon as possible.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake