Pubdate: Thu, 18 Jun 2009
Source: Detroit Free Press (MI)
Copyright: 2009 Detroit Free Press
Contact:  http://www.freep.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/125
Author: Megha Satyanarayana, Free Press Staff Writer
Referenced: Initiated Law 1 of 2008 http://micares.org/
Referenced: Michigan Medical Marihuana Program 
http://www.michigan.gov/mdch/0,1607,7-132-27417_51869---,00.html
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topic/Michigan+Medical+Marijuana
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Marijuana - Medicinal)

AMBIGUITY IN NEW MARIJUANA LAW IS CITED

A district court judge dismissed felony drug charges Wednesday 
against a Madison Heights couple embroiled in one of the first major 
tests of the state's medical marijuana law.

Calling it "one of the worst pieces of legislation I've ever seen in 
my life," 43rd District Judge Robert J. Turner criticized multiple 
ambiguities in the voter-initiated law, including how much marijuana 
a supposed medical user could possess and still be free from 
prosecution. Under the law, there are several scenarios in which a 
person can be in valid possession of a various amount of marijuana.

"Every judge in the state of Michigan will have to determine what a 
reasonable amount is," he said.

It's one of many fears state health officials have voiced in 
administering the law, which was enacted Dec. 4, 2008. It wasn't 
until four months later that a registration program was started.

The Madison Heights case explored one problem -- was the required 
doctor's letter enough proof of legal marijuana use when a 
registration program had not yet begun?

On March 30, three weeks after getting recommendation letters from 
Dr. Eric Eisenbud of the Hemp and Cannabis Foundation Medical Clinic 
in Southfield, but five days before they could apply for state ID 
cards, Madison Heights police stormed the home of Robert Redden, 59, 
and Torey Clark, 47. Police seized 21 small marijuana plants and money.

The two were individually charged with felonies for intent to 
manufacture marijuana. Each faced up to 14 years in prison, since 
they had prior drug offenses, and up to $1 million each in fines.

The couple and their lawyers argued the letters were sufficient for 
legal use of marijuana for Redden's hip pain and Clark's cancer nausea.

Police and the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office disagreed. 
Prosecutor Beth Hand also questioned how often patients needed to see 
a doctor to renew registration.

After the dismissal, Eisenbud said the issue of determining a 
reasonable amount of medicinal marijuana would be resolved if the 
state regulated growth and distribution of uniform medical-grade marijuana. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake