Pubdate: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 Source: Nanaimo Daily News (CN BC) Copyright: 2009 Nanaimo Daily News Contact: http://www.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1608 Author: William Perry CIVIL FORFEITURE LAWS CREATE 'REVERSE ONUS' With the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously concluding that a federal law was wrong to order the forfeiture of Judy Ann Craig's home, the way is clear for others to challenge the seizure of assets, such as the Hells Angels Nanaimo clubhouse. This is the beginning of the end of this unfair law. Civil forfeiture laws, in my opinion, create a "reverse-onus" requiring defendants to prove they did not gain the asset from unlawful activity. Examinations for discovery are conducted and cases are decided on the civil standard of proof -- the balance of probabilities -- rather than the higher criminal standard, beyond a reasonable doubt. In other jurisdictions that have introduced civil forfeiture legislation, such as Italy, South Africa, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Fiji, the provinces of Ontario, Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, individual states within Australia, and Antigua, statistics indicate that asset forfeiture has failed to prevent methamphetamine drug crime. In those jurisdictions, there are hundreds of documented cases of innocent citizens wrongfully deprived of their homes, businesses and livelihoods. For example, 80% of property forfeited in the U.S. was seized from owners who were never even charged with a crime. This double-edged sword has created opportunity for agencies to abandon investigations, and creates a conflict of interest between effective crime control, the courts, and creative fiscal management that will persist so long as law enforcement agencies remain dependent on civil asset forfeiture. It is like ticketing the motor vehicle rather than the driver who was behind the wheel. In the case of photo radar, a ticket would be sent to the owner of the vehicle, which may not be the driver. William Perry Victoria - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom