Pubdate: Fri, 22 May 2009
Source: New Zealand Herald (New Zealand)
Copyright: 2009 New Zealand Herald
Contact: http://info.nzherald.co.nz/letters/
Website: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/300
Author: Andrew Laxon
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine)

STUDENTS SIGN UP FOR RANDOM DRUG TESTS

Today is the final of a six-part series on the damage methamphetamine 
is doing to New Zealand and what we can do to fix it.

Students at some Northland schools are signing up for voluntary 
random drug testing to prove they can stay clean for a year.

Under the Rubicon drug education programme, students who get into 
trouble for using drugs can sign a contract to attend counselling 
sessions and stay drug and alcohol-free for 12 months.

Part of the agreement is that they can be randomly drug tested at 
school up to three times a year.

Bream Bay College principal Wayne Buckland said his school found 
about 25 students using drugs each year.

It used the programme because nearly all students completed it 
successfully and it helped teenagers who had used drugs resist peer 
pressure to use them again. "They just say they're on Rubicon."

But few schools appear to be keen on random drug testing across all 
students, as introduced in parts of the United States.

Methamphetamine consultant Mike Sabin, who floated the idea in a 
paper to a parliamentary select committee last year, said he did not 
necessarily recommend compulsory testing in all schools.

But the idea of screening students for drugs had two main benefits - 
it allowed young people with drug problems to get help early and gave 
all students an excuse to say no, in case they were caught.

Mr Buckland said that he could not see a lot of benefit in testing 
all students and it seemed philosophically wrong to do so if they had 
not been found using drugs in the first place.

Another Northland school which announced plans to introduce random 
testing for all pupils three years ago has backed away from the idea.

Otamatea High School board chairwoman Lynda Lewin said the school 
found it was difficult to be sure how long ago drugs had been taken 
and "we can't control what they're doing outside of school".

The school had twice tried sniffer dogs, which found a few students 
with drugs the first time and no one the second time.

In the end it also signed up with Rubicon, which has links with 
police and the local area health board, because it offered a more 
positive service, including counselling for families as well as the students.

Last year a report by the Australian National Council on Drugs found 
no evidence that drug testing in schools acted as a deterrent or 
reduced the harm caused by drugs.

It estimated that drug testing every Australian child once a year 
could cost about A$355 million ($452 million). Annual tests on a 
random 10 per cent of the school population three times a year could 
cost up to A$110 million.

The study also raised questions about the accuracy of testing and the 
ethical and legal implications such as children's rights to privacy.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom