Pubdate: Wed, 06 May 2009 Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA) Page: A - 14 Copyright: 2009 Hearst Communications Inc. Contact: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/388 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/racial.htm (Racial Issues) CRACK THE DISPARITY In 1986, Washington passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act and a judicial outrage was born. The measure set a federal mandatory minimum sentence of five years for dealing 5 grams of crack cocaine - but meted out the same sentence for 500 grams of powder cocaine. Why the 100-to-1 sentencing disparity? Congress believed that crack was a more powerful drug with more violence associated with it. But as civil rights groups noted, the big difference seems to be that crack offenders have been disproportionately black. According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, more than 4 out of 5 of those prosecuted on federal crack charges in 2006 were African American, while 9 percent were white. At the same time, powder cocaine offenders were 27 percent African American, 14 percent white - and 58 percent Hispanic. In 1995, the Sentencing Commission found that there was no evidence for the disparate treatment of the crimes; 14 years later, Washington has failed to correct or reduce this discriminatory practice. In recent years, Congress toyed with reducing the sentencing disparity to 20-to-1 but could not manage even that inadequate adjustment. President Obama seems poised to end this institutional inequity. Last week, Lanny Breuer, the chief of the Department of Justice Criminal Division, spoke to a Senate judiciary subcommittee in favor of lowering the crack sentence so that it is equal to sentences for powder cocaine. Breuer argued that the effects of crack and powder cocaine are similar. While there does seem to be more violence associated with the crack trade, Breuer added, "the best way to address drug-related violence is to ensure the most severe sentences are meted out to those who commit violence offenses." Correct. Who will stand in the way? Some drug warriors have said they would support equal sentences only if powder sentences match draconian crack sentences. And there is concern over the possibility that new sentences will clog up the courts with appeals for retroactive resentencing. The Washington Post reported that Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., favored adjusting the ratio but not necessarily equalizing it. Spokesman Gil Duran told us, "Sen. Feinstein leans heavily toward the 1-to-1 ratio. She's studying the issue carefully, and there is not yet a bill before the Senate." She should support a bill that promotes fairness in the future, adjusts draconian crack sentences and doesn't condemn low-level offenders to overly hard time. Two words she might want to keep in mind: equal justice. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom