Pubdate: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 Source: Globe and Mail (Canada) Copyright: 2009 The Globe and Mail Company Contact: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/feedback/?form=lettersToTheEditorForm Website: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/168 Author: Wendy Stueck OTTAWA ON B.C.'S TURF, COURT TOLD VANCOUVER -- The federal government has thrown its weight around on provincial turf when it comes to Vancouver's supervised injection site, a lawyer for the province said yesterday in court. "Co-operative federalism means from time to time, we get to play in one another's sand box - and in this case, the federal government gets to play in ours," Craig Jones, representing the Attorney-General of British Columbia, told a three-judge panel of the B.C. Court of Appeal. "But they have to play nice. That's co-operative federalism." His comments were made on the second day of what's expected to be a three-day appeal of a 2008 ruling that allowed Insite to stay open on constitutional grounds. Opened in 2003, Insite is located in the Downtown Eastside and provides a space where addicts can inject illegal drugs under medical supervision. The facility has operated through an exemption under section 56 of Canada's Controlled Drug and Substances Act, which provides for exemption if "necessary for a medical or scientific purpose or is otherwise in the public interest." An initial three-year exemption was granted in 2003 and extended twice more, first until the end of 2007 and then until June 30, 2008. With the clock ticking down on the exemption, the clinic's operator, PHS Community Services, and went to court in a bid to keep it open. When it comes to Insite, Mr. Jones argued, federal concerns over illegal activity should take a back seat to provincial health concerns, such as preventing drug overdose deaths and the spread of disease. "The federal interest in criminal matters, when push comes to shove, must give way to the provincial interest in the delivery of community health services," he said. B.C.'s Attorney-General is one of several intervenors in the appeal of last year's ruling by Mr. Justice Ian Pitfield of B.C. Supreme Court. In that judgment, Judge Pitfield described Insite's services as health care. Because sections of the CDSA that relate to possession and trafficking deny addicts access to those health services, those sections infringe Section 7 of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, he determined, and are therefore unconstitutional. In the ruling, the federal government was given until June 30, 2009, to redraft the provisions of the CDSA against possession and trafficking to accommodate Insite's operation. In the interim, users and staff at Insite were granted a constitutional exemption from the effect of the CDSA, allowing Insite to operate. - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart