Pubdate: Sun, 22 Mar 2009
Source: North County Times (Escondido, CA)
Copyright: 2009 Associated Press
Contact: http://www.nctimes.com/forms/letters/editor.html
Website: http://www.nctimes.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1080
Author: Greg Risling, Associated Press
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/topic/dispensaries
Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/people/Charles+Lynch
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal)

POT ADVOCATES EXHALE AFTER AG SIGNALS POLICY SHIFT

LOS ANGELES ---- Medical marijuana users and dispensary owners in 
California have held their breath for years, fearful they would be 
targeted for prosecution by the federal government.

They finally exhaled this past week when U.S. Attorney General Eric 
Holder said federal agents will now target marijuana distributors 
only when they violate both federal and state laws, a departure from 
the policy of the Bush administration.

It's not seen by many as a move by the Obama administration toward 
the legalization of marijuana.

However, it could end much of the confusion among state and federal 
authorities dealing with the mishmash of laws in which cultivating, 
using and selling pot for medical purposes is allowed by states but 
outlawed by the federal government.

"This signals, in my mind, a true kind of federalism," said Jody 
Armour, a law professor at the University of Southern California. 
"The federal government is allowing states to take chances, to take 
experiments and see what happens."

California is one of 13 states that allows medical use of marijuana.

Over the past 2.5 years, the federal Drug Enforcement Administration 
has raided at least 80 dispensaries in California, the majority in 
the Central District that extends from the Central Coast down to 
Orange County and includes Los Angeles.

Yet, criminal charges have only been filed in several of those cases 
against the biggest distributors accused of breaking both federal and 
state laws, said Thom Mrozek, spokesman for the U.S. attorney's 
office in the Central District of California.

"What we have done in all of our narcotic cases is to focus on 
large-scale traffickers," Mrozek said. "In terms of what happens in 
the future, the federal government will continue to enforce federal 
narcotics law."

The confusion was reflected in a case against Charles Lynch, who ran 
a marijuana dispensary in Morro Bay. Federal prosecutors said he 
should have known his employees sold marijuana outside his store.

Lynch, 47, was convicted in August of distributing more than 100 
kilograms of marijuana. His sentencing is set for Monday; guidelines 
allow up to 85 years but prosecutors recommended a five-year prison sentence.

Lynch's attorneys will try to persuade Department of Justice 
officials to drop the case.

"The feds picked the wrong guy," federal public defender Reuven Cohen 
said. "It's pure fiction that somehow Charlie was not in compliance 
with state law."

Two of the jurors who convicted Lynch also took issue with the 
federal prosecution. They wrote letters to U.S. District Judge George 
Wu asking for leniency, saying they felt they were forced to find him 
guilty under federal guidelines.

"Because of the instructions we were given regarding that we were to 
disregard state law, I felt we had no other option but to convict Mr. 
Lynch," juror Andy Gordon wrote.

Fellow panelist Reza Iranpour called the verdict a "miscarriage of 
justice" and said Lynch was a victim of "bureaucratic conflict."

Lynch "faces the prospect of being severely punished for trusting 
misleading laws and regulations," Iranpour wrote.

Medical marijuana advocates say the change in federal policy 
announced by Holder mirrors the spirit of the 1996 California ballot 
initiative that made it legal to sell the drug to people with a prescription.

"I think that if nothing else it gives people a sense of optimism 
that the federal government is going to back off," said James Shaw, 
director of the Union of Medical Marijuana Patients. "But it's not 
entirely clear to me if they are going to do that."

Holder didn't specify who would be exempt from future DEA raids. And 
one federal prosecutor said cases will still be filed against people 
who violate the law by selling marijuana for nonmedicinal purposes 
and other actions.

"From the type of dispensaries we have seen over the years, it may be 
anticipated this does not signal an end to federal enforcement 
actions but instead a refinement," said acting U.S. Attorney Lawrence 
Brown in Sacramento.

Times have changed, agreed Elliot Katz, a senior member of a Los 
Angeles-based marijuana collective, but not necessarily for the better.

He recalled walking into a dispensary when he was first issued a 
medical marijuana card in the mid-1990s and finding that everyone was 
visibly sick.

These days, marijuana users who have no medical reason to obtain the 
drug are taking advantage of the system, he said.

"It's up to the doctor or dispensary operator to weed out those 
people," said Katz, 46, who has AIDS. "The government can do all they 
want to regulate, but it's up to us to regulate ourselves."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom