Pubdate: Thu, 19 Mar 2009
Source: Ottawa Citizen (CN ON)
Copyright: 2009 The Ottawa Citizen
Contact: http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/letters.html
Website: http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/326
Author: Elizabeth Payne
Note: Elizabeth Payne is a member of the Citizen's editorial board.
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction)

HOMELESS ALCOHOLICS CAN'T JUST QUIT

Managing alcohol addiction, including free drinks, has worked wonders 
- -- and shows why we must treat addictions equally

Every day, in the shadow of Parliament Hill, 30 homeless alcoholics 
are fed, housed and served drinks, each hour on the hour, between 
early morning and evening.

That this "managed alcohol" program run by Ottawa's Inner City Health 
Inc. in the ByWard Market, is effective, is beyond dispute. For one 
thing, it has saved the local health-care system in the neighbourhood 
of $3.5 million by reducing or eliminating its clients' frequent 
visits to hospital emergency rooms. For another, it has dramatically 
improved the quality of life for a group of people many would view as 
beyond hope.

What is remarkable is not so much that the program works, but that it 
is able to run relatively free of major controversy or political 
interference. Substitute 30 crack addicts for the homeless 
alcoholics, and it would be a different story.

In a country where harm reduction is frequently a lightning rod for 
controversy -- whether the issue is free crack pipes or a safe 
injection site -- we have a successful harm-reduction program 
flourishing in the nation's capital. That's a good thing, perhaps a 
remarkable thing, but it's too bad we can't extend its creativity to 
another group also in need of harm reduction -- drug addicts.

It may seem counterintuitive to give addicts what is making them 
sick, but the Inner City Health program demonstrates it can help them 
live healthier, happier and less disruptive lives. Despite the fact 
that they are kept "buzzed" all day as a Citizen reporter put it, 
they are actually drinking less -- maybe two-thirds less -- than they 
would have been on the street. They can't panhandle while on the 
program and must meet strict requirements, which they agree to. And 
the fact is many homeless alcoholics can't quit. The best that can be 
done is to manage their addiction.

And that is quite a lot. Managed alcohol serves both its clients and 
society extremely well. Which makes the question of whether they 
should quit irrelevant.

Wendy Muckle, a registered nurse who is executive director of Ottawa 
Inner City Health says addicts have a chronic illness. Helping them 
learn how to manage their illnesses, she says, is often the only 
intervention that is effective.

"You get politicians who are basically saying 'These people need to 
pull up their socks and get cured,' when these people have chronic 
diseases. It is as stupid as saying a diabetic needs to pull up his socks.

"I think we have to figure out humane and safe ways to support people 
when they are in difficult periods of their lives, encouraging them 
to maintain a place in mainstream society."

Unlike the managed alcohol program, Vancouver's supervised injection 
site, Insite, exists under the constant threat of closure from those 
whose ideology tells them it should not exist.

But what is the difference between a program that reduces harm for 
addicted alcoholics and one that attempts to reduce harm for addicted 
drug addicts? Yes, alcohol is legal and heroin is not, but the amount 
of damage each substance can do to lives doesn't discriminate between 
legality and illegality.

In fact Muckle says her view of which drug does the most harm has 
completely turned around. "Before I started this job, I would have 
said crack cocaine was the most harmful drug available. I now have to 
say it is alcohol."

Programs such as Inner City Health can come up with creative 
solutions to work with alcoholics, but it is much harder and much 
more political with drug addicts. Muckle says she would love to have 
a similar program for crack and heroin addicts, if she could. In 
fact, she believes such an intensive program would not be necessary 
for most drug addicts.

A safe injection site, she said, would be a "kind of a beginning." 
 From there, a lot more could be done for that population. Something 
that would have a huge impact is housing.

Many people think residential treatment is the only option for drug 
addicts. Muckle disagrees. "We have to change the assumptions and 
provide other kinds of help than we do." For some, residential 
treatment programs will be entirely ineffective, she says, mainly 
because they don't last long enough to make a real difference. A 
long, slow process that includes group therapy, harm reduction 
programs and some place to live, would have a better chance of succeeding.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom