Pubdate: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 Source: Times-Herald, The (Vallejo, CA) Copyright: 2009 The Times-Herald Contact: http://www.timesheraldonline.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/993 Author: Ronnie Winn P82076 GREATER EFFORTS NEEDED TO REHABILITATE NARCOTICS OFFENDERS Few would dispute that heroin traffic is controlled by the underworld. Although there are some encouraging signs recently, it would appear that the top figures here are still in the "untouchable" class. Certainly, in most instances, it is the small pusher who serves time in jail for drug offenses. Nine times out of 10 this person has a habit himself and makes just enough to keep his own habit going. The majority of narcotics addicts today are - in amount of profit made in the narcotics game and the likelihood of serving time in jail - "non-white" and live in economically depressed sections of large metropolitan areas. Conversely, virtually all of the big dealers are white and live in suburbia. Once a man has been arrested for narcotics violation, a vicious circle begins. He becomes known to the authorities and is stopped for questioning more often. It is said to be virtually impossible to deal in drugs or commit any major illegal operation without the police becoming aware of it. It is now rather freely admitted that blacks, the poor and other members of the American underclass do not obtain an equal break under our justice system. The black narcotics offender has been perhaps the most dispossessed of the second-class citizens. The society as a whole tends to see him as incurable, evil, dangerous and a menace. He is unlikely to get the best legal counsel, and when he does get a "good lawyer" he has to resort to the same sort of illegal behaviors to obtain money for the lawyer's fee which may be higher than normal because of the addict's poor risk potential. An overriding thought with most narcotics addicts is how to acquire money as quickly as possible with minimal risk. He tries hard to avoid committing crimes where weapons are involved and greatly prefers not to come into direct physical contact with his victims. Favorites are check forging, shoplifting, burglarizing apartments when the occupants are away, or executing a confidence game. Even when he is stealing items from something like a large department store, he will tend to take three articles at different times, each with a market value of just under $50, rather than one worth $150. This is because the penalty for stealing something more than $50 is much severe than is the case for under $50. Nonetheless, as his habit continues to grow, and as he gets deeper and deeper involved in debt, he gets more desperate, turning to mugging and arm robbery. Eventually he gets caught. Traditionally, the courts have dealt harshly with narcotics offenders. In large part, this is a function of the fact that the law's governing drug-related offenses are mostly strict and leave little latitude for the judge to exercise discretion. In evaluating legislation in this area, one may concern himself primarily with protecting the individual user or with protecting society from the user. To date, the emphasis has been primarily or protecting society. This has been attempted by making the drugs hard to obtain and illegal to possess, and giving long sentences to those convicted of a violation. Unfortunately, however, most of those convicted and sent to prison are the low men on the totem pole - people who are, in most cases, themselves addicted. They go to jail, get released, once again acquire their habit, and start the whole cycle over again. If any progress is to be made, ways must be found to rehabilitate the narcotics offender. I dedicate this letter to the memory of my father, Hurtha Winn, and to the Rendlemans' father, James Paul Rendleman. I'm not the one! May both of these fathers rest in peace. Big man, RIP. Ronnie Winn P82076 Solano State Prison The writer is serving a prison sentence for a 2000 involuntary manslaughter conviction. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin