Pubdate: Sun, 27 Dec 2009
Source: Miami Herald (FL)
Copyright: 2009 Project Syndicate
Contact:  http://www.miamiherald.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/262
Author: Jorge G. Castaneda, www.project-syndicate.org
Note: Jorge G. Castaneda, former Foreign Minister of Mexico 
(2000-2003), is a Global Distinguished Professor of Politics and 
Latin American Studies at NYU.

MEXICO FIGHTING A WAR IT CAN'T WIN

MEXICO CITY -- Three years ago this month, Mexican President Felipe 
Calderon donned military fatigues and declared a full-scale war on 
drugs, ordering the Army into Mexico's streets, highways, and 
villages. Back then, Calderon received broad support, both 
domestically and from abroad, for what was viewed as a brave, 
overdue, and necessary decision. Tangible results were predicted to come soon.

Moreover, George W. Bush's administration quickly promised American 
support -- the so-called Merida Initiative, signed in February, 2007 
- -- and public-opinion polls showed that Calderon had, in one fell 
swoop, left behind the travails of his close and questioned electoral 
victory, gaining the trust of the Mexican people. But today, things 
look very different.

At a recent debate with, among others, Fareed Zakaria of Newsweek and 
CNN, Asa Hutchison, the former head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement 
Administration, the main question was whether the United States was 
to blame for Mexico's drug war. I pointed out that neither the U.S. 
nor Mexico was to blame; only Calderon was. Just like Bush's invasion 
of Iraq, Mexico's drug war was a war of choice. It was a war that 
Calderon should not have declared, that cannot be won, and that is 
doing enormous damage to Mexico.

Today, a growing number of Mexicans shares this view. As the war 
drags on, positive results are nowhere to be seen, while violence in 
the country is escalating. On December 9, for example, according to 
the daily newspaper Reforma , 40 people died in firefights between 
police and army forces and the drug cartels. More than 6,500 
fatalities will have occurred this year alone, topping last year's 
total, which was double that in 2007.

I believe that Calderon declared this war because he felt the need to 
legitimize himself before Mexico's people, given the doubts 
surrounding his victory in the 2006 presidential election -- doubts 
that his supporters, like me, never shared. And I believe that it is 
unwinnable because it fails to comply with the tenets of the Powell 
Doctrine, elaborated 18 years ago by Colin Powell, then Chairman of 
the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, in relation to the first Gulf War.

Powell enumerated four conditions that must be satisfied in order to 
succeed in a military operation.

.  One was deployment of overwhelming force, which the Mexican military lacks.

.  Another was definable victory, which one never has in a war on 
drugs (a term first used by Richard Nixon in the late 1960s).

.  The third condition was an exit strategy at the outset, which 
Calderon lacks, because he can neither withdraw in defeat in his own 
country, nor withdraw and declare victory.

.  Calderon still does enjoy the support of the public -- Powell's 
fourth condition -- but he is beginning to lose it.

Over the past three years, more than 15,000 Mexicans have died in the 
drug war. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the U.N. 
Human Rights Council Universal Peer Review have all documented, with 
more or less evidence and precision, a proliferation of abuses and an 
absence of accountability for them. Of the more than 220,000 people 
arrested on drug charges since Calderon took office, three-quarters 
have been released. Only 5 percent of the remaining 60,000 or so have 
been tried and sentenced.

Meanwhile, acreage used for poppy and marijuana production has risen, 
according to the US government, to 6,900 and 8,900 hectares, 
respectively. Restrictions on the transshipment of cocaine from South 
America to the United States have made only a dent in street prices, 
which spiked in 2008 but have stabilized in 2009 at levels well below 
their historical highs in the 1990's.

According to the U.S. government's International Narcotics Control 
Strategy Report (INCSR), opium, heroin, and marijuana seizures have 
decreased since Calderon began his drug war, and drug production in 
Mexico is on the rise. In 2008, according to the US State Department, 
potential heroin production reached 18 metric tons, up from 13 metric 
tons in 2006, as production of opium gum rose to 149 metric tons, 
from 110 metric tons. Cannabis production grew by 300 metric tons 
over this period, to 15,800 metric tons. In other words, since 
Calderon began his war on drugs, more Mexican drugs are on the 
market, not less.

There is no easy way out of this quagmire. The National Police Force 
that Mexico's last three presidents -- Ernesto Zedillo, Vicente Fox 
and Calderon -- have tried to build is still far from ready to 
replace the Army in drug-enforcement tasks. American assistance, as a 
U.S. General Accountability Office report made clear in early 
December, is barely trickling in. Indeed, by some accounts, only 2 
percent of the projected $1.3 billion in aid has been disbursed.

Perhaps the least bad solution would be to proceed by default: 
gradually allow the drug war to vanish from the news, to be replaced 
by other wars: on poverty, on petty crime, and for economic growth. 
This may not be ideal, but it is better than prolonging a fight that 
can't be won.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake